Message-ID: <efe6a7978b1cc6287f122d8e829d8bd318466849.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211/cfg80211: Add support to send tx frames at
 specified rate
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     vamsin@codeaurora.org, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, jouni@codeaurora.org
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:13:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <63224d0fc1e978624de9887cb7349c02@codeaurora.org>
References: <1543838646-3574-1-git-send-email-vamsin@codeaurora.org>
         <89e6532daf4011de2ad0df3dcb8accc42334f31e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <899698ca-d8b5-45b1-5689-58096e2f0291@candelatech.com>
         <63224d0fc1e978624de9887cb7349c02@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 23:19 +0530, vamsin@codeaurora.org wrote:

> Unfortunately, the driver that I am working now is not upstreamed. I 
> would like to check with Ben if he likes to propose a patch ath10k 
> driver that he is working on as I see he is also interested in this 
> feature. Please let me know if it is mandatory or good to have driver 
> implementation.

I'm not sure it really has to be *mandatory*, but if nobody else even
wants to have support for this (and e.g. iwlwifi cannot even easily do
this I believe) then what value does something have upstream?

johannes