MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181218080815.19395-1-chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com>
 <CABPxzYK+Tu678C=84i3+67gA1EBw_pG3cJ1y1ZvWZobU6iS8Dg@mail.gmail.com> <87lg3j6aly.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
In-Reply-To: <87lg3j6aly.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
From:   Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 01:17:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CABPxzYKHMUQyM+gi5-u-PVmD-viCxAaweeGUGWQ7jkjqG==amQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: update 60ghz band rules for us
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:20 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 1:38 PM <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Chaitanya Tata <Chaitanya.Mgit@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Include channels 4, 5 & 6 for US in 60GHz band. FCC extended the
> >> 57-64GHz band till 71GHz with almost same rules.
> >> ---
> >>  db.txt | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> >> index fa5c0e0..ae650dd 100644
> >> --- a/db.txt
> >> +++ b/db.txt
> >> @@ -1280,9 +1280,9 @@ country US: DFS-FCC
> >>         (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (23), DFS
> >>         (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
> >>         # 60g band
> >> -       # reference: http://cfr.regstoday.com/47cfr15.aspx#47_CFR_15p255
> >> -       # channels 1,2,3, EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> >> -       (57240 - 63720 @ 2160), (40)
> >> +       # reference: section IV-D https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
> >> +       # channels 1-6 EIRP=40dBm(43dBm peak)
> >> +       (57240 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)
> >>
> >>  country UY: DFS-FCC
> >>         (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> >>
> > Kalle/Seth,
> >
> > Any update on this? Patchwork shows its delegated to you(may be by default).
>
> Seth doesn't use patchwork so I just delegate regdb patches to myself
> and then mark them as 'Not Applicaple'.
>
Ah okay, Thanks. Will wait for Seth to comment on this.


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Chaitanya T K.