Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7564DC282C4 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509321726 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548189829; bh=FPrPaw5sOKBv2EszEW1iWbFcEMTr83cFvl+dLpsxvls=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=tErlG6XF2U6XmRyv/JMfRis01wt2UKgM+7eXMlVhYbMi3cBYlcVH04+hJPVBpGdSH xvHqmlKlIQPfheB4VZm4Ow4hyK89qGEWtVnp6Ylc57vrGXzfJyvF4H+9xXmYfufxCF q+Nxj6vYkvcFuizYq4SNjcmZ/v84+p/Fe71ibWjs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726213AbfAVUno (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:43:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58914 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725862AbfAVUnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:43:43 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCA0021726; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548189823; bh=FPrPaw5sOKBv2EszEW1iWbFcEMTr83cFvl+dLpsxvls=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P16Np6dqJlI9XSe+AyKdzMOMsLj/CuZBWL2rZ00jGTmrz13WBHUUavsZuzxRmmer4 qnteSwse1fFAgHNkjUxyRremM37yO8H7YIV15a+KX7sxkNd+TuswlBP123B268hcvi vmmsbcKUIb0l2/7NxOWxh1SpMXOQ2RhOsP51tFYM= Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:43:40 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Chi-Hsien Lin , Wright Feng , Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Message-ID: <20190122204340.GA30535@kroah.com> References: <20190122152151.16139-32-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <530d2424-d679-c81a-9d11-02b2d7631bea@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <530d2424-d679-c81a-9d11-02b2d7631bea@broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:07:48PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > The prefix should be 'brcmsmac'. > > On 1/22/2019 4:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > > never do something different based on this. > > I could argue that if above is true it would be better to make the debugfs > function return void, but I won't ;-p I would really want to do that, but sometimes you need that return value to pass to other debugfs functions :( > In start_creating() the parent dentry is indeed checked for IS_ERR() so... > > Acked-by: Arend van Spriel thanks for the review! greg k-h