Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D27C282C5 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433CA2184C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bKQ8M2wu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726761AbfAXSUO (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:20:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:53199 "EHLO mail-wm1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725913AbfAXSUN (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:20:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id m1so4222850wml.2; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:20:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BIBJq82hkm+qIkG+xr4tAkKYfkF+2DF/cutYzEy5If0=; b=bKQ8M2wuEfKQzvBgV+EVfavWhZZLbIWeiy3lDuS2FiS2Dc3ugs8yE4PmG51F3ine2S GJ3+JVP3xXSgSiNTv6jB2yRbmwcSG5KPpv+NuqBDHEP+OowIlm1FlINOaYi3rjc+lZZc rGFwBS45dBRA/JPzP1Cb5NeMmKRnA7XngAH09uGT0gUD2jPp3oGm1lSNFTRtDpZYiVFS 5rfy+cTsqufOuzd1JBo9sXJknZ5HJ5R78xhXzpxrzk1rfCxMWfhjxLHQGjdaI02Uq+GD Y2CJNE/b9DDG2Xx5u6KMYnxOweA9iXxBrXbcGFsXzm55EaQWmqwuiOAopuCQAoqwXtLJ N/Ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BIBJq82hkm+qIkG+xr4tAkKYfkF+2DF/cutYzEy5If0=; b=KrUTXHTS/CLRzpWlXbZnDJyxafz9ouPEy0UHRN8FdIQuU/KVgP0RMyW8NTw8vcoHjJ c0uREGKmhzDkWc91LBEJszBYTV8kKn4fMFzqJOYl152TDctsd3Z6UNc9zszucudFsyLT boeO8ewVQg6aGm6fizhlXKQ7Gq6P7VNWn88DNvIfRSH2aB6ey53JEa+bBna4RkBdK9Kn 4PZnMau39BmRJmhDwkpuoMzq777Im3yYyDzPx+zj1gGPz3Btw7FBFqc3O7SkKlWTTFLj 0lo/xP1ekryrcxfoT+I6TbrqT/ja/ZF1/s+Trr8+5jQQRMitRhgiQ+mfg/BWB/N6aRNX ePXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfWcL5WkJKz7Pt/AMWfMOVRmXY0GZLaLmVgmrLmYojBk7PnHKyh /Py67m53QqmRF5ZkzSGCJjs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5m51Z20rtSvf7lI9wWrOsfvn8OAlHeX/HsScX66o3ByR5sXtJ0XkhssrK5yWmWqJtl5NwVzA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9ed7:: with SMTP id h206mr3552223wme.28.1548354011486; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:20:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from macbookpro.malat.net (bru31-1-78-225-224-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.225.224.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm62275538wmi.5.2019.01.24.10.20.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by macbookpro.malat.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83ED41143573; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:20:04 +0100 (CET) From: Mathieu Malaterre To: Johannes Berg Cc: Mathieu Malaterre , Johannes Berg , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2] mac80211: Add attribute aligned(2) to struct 'action' Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:19:57 +0100 Message-Id: <20190124181957.22915-1-malat@debian.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2 In-Reply-To: <20190124180535.20216-1-malat@debian.org> References: <20190124180535.20216-1-malat@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org During refactor in commit 9e478066eae4 ("mac80211: fix MU-MIMO follow-MAC mode") a new struct 'action' was declared with packed attribute as: struct { struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr hdr; u8 category; u8 action_code; } __packed action; But since struct 'ieee80211_hdr_3addr' is declared with an aligned keyword as: struct ieee80211_hdr { __le16 frame_control; __le16 duration_id; u8 addr1[ETH_ALEN]; u8 addr2[ETH_ALEN]; u8 addr3[ETH_ALEN]; __le16 seq_ctrl; u8 addr4[ETH_ALEN]; } __packed __aligned(2); Solve the ambiguity of placing aligned structure in a packed one by adding the aligned(2) attribute to struct 'action'. This seems to be the behavior of gcc anyway, since the following is still compiling: BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(action) != IEEE80211_MIN_ACTION_SIZE + 1); This removes the following warning (W=1): net/mac80211/rx.c:234:2: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned] Cc: Johannes Berg Suggested-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre --- v2: It was suggested by Johannes that an arch actually need the pack attribute (alpha). net/mac80211/rx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c index 45aad3d3108c..885df250b67e 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void ieee80211_handle_mu_mimo_mon(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr hdr; u8 category; u8 action_code; - } __packed action; + } __packed __aligned(2) action; if (!sdata) return; -- 2.19.2