Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7580EC282C8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4022C21738 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="us1NT7w7" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727176AbfA1U4z (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:56:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com ([209.85.210.65]:38585 "EHLO mail-ot1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727115AbfA1U4z (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:56:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id e12so15947590otl.5 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:56:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=RL98/9QZlF5TNZfVGeTgnqpJZRrJJM6JtEWgzW/vPp8=; b=us1NT7w7V1FPtW7lAccBCQiL684EvXe3I74OtzkJtPyJc3gEltu8ld8hYZl7x/DEkH eKAxpDt5ya50YMAIAblQhK2xRFXT5jv2pfTBUzd+KIVfRV/ZFeCrEB9Ji+J6ddV1X6iQ tfMN61/6nT0EsJUeAHpcJ3lX+lwaXmkyCPJ83YSFN+orlVwiHY0XpBohkzeDBdsm+Tkq 4umvzCXurG+9oTf2DW/39nFNWlhjh5XvY4Uio1y1g3YCsA5HhCFeM4Zy7TfHJa3U6kO4 fEEol+lItD83/Lu7wJD0+aherVVTqjgyLZsuJl/z/T88WYteP0Pn8MSnk1+NfH1VG+nh vndw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=RL98/9QZlF5TNZfVGeTgnqpJZRrJJM6JtEWgzW/vPp8=; b=EI0eMhCBCBXRAIUYMNxuWXZeq7wX27s0FrI0IyIPN6gQwrQkhYgMwLO+ZXHRhDE9At Xpsvh+UdDSpmI8vGXBC09b7JvLUyZRyhJLKEd2gYI+YK72pqQJuNzwM7IRDAu4SPjOYk 9oDZS55BJRMAY06L4u8GuCKgC08j1nFs9fkNrFArI0rS7yhsVG6cio04yAHCxFMpGp2H 5RLtmafRtPu2uuU/y0lxdAHq6/tpQ7RKhpoME3d/div3/2Zbplh4KnKf5YY7aaKEaKaS hXaeoni6xvEmwd9/Tc2Qpu8kpnPjgnSw1mFY/X/A8S4ER7D+Sr9Q6wpCD+At52ZUvTwg BZ8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfnkN1gEXdpanS9DdTowDvDU6ciBC6mD7iIdrth1dagkii02/2z NoPSQEcM86PzQWiOVSF+cQnQoIjC X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6ea84GshdsqLmF7roSBnoShUup4qy/AwFbIsjf5uxmNHFt2+pX1uwVFBTUqp93vscCUARzng== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2661:: with SMTP id a88mr17885567otb.91.1548709014355; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (cpe-24-31-245-230.kc.res.rr.com. [24.31.245.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u19sm5379807oia.31.2019.01.28.12.56.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:56:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] rtw88: mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips To: =?UTF-8?B?6I6K5b2l5a6j?= Cc: Pkshih , tehuang@realtek.com, briannorris@chromium.org, sgruszka@redhat.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1548654407-28469-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> From: Larry Finger Message-ID: <043aedf4-0ed4-e128-3cd2-242aaef128f6@lwfinger.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:56:51 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1548654407-28469-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------E4D2F68B98824868CFAF1C68" Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E4D2F68B98824868CFAF1C68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tony, I had not tested rtw88 for some time, so I built a kernel with the V3 patches and found that rtw88 crashed with a NULL pointer dereference. I did some debugging and found that the problem was in routine rtw_chip_efuse_enable() where fw->firmware was NULL. Next I verified that rtw_load_firmware() had been called, which gave a clue that the firmware had not finished loading by the time rtw_chip_efuse_enable() was called. By adding a wait_for_completion() call before the rtw_download_firmware() call, the problem was fixed. The problem was a race between calling rtw_chip_efuse_enable() and the firmware load from disk. Obviously, the speed ratio between my CPU and the disk system is much different on my laptop than on your test machines, thus I have the problem. The patch I used is attached. Larry --------------E4D2F68B98824868CFAF1C68 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="rtw88_fix_race_at_start.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rtw88_fix_race_at_start.patch" diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c index a189c4500fd9..690c0a68a038 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static int rtw_chip_efuse_enable(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev) goto err; } + wait_for_completion(&fw->completion); rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_C2HEVT, C2H_HW_FEATURE_DUMP); ret = rtw_download_firmware(rtwdev, fw->firmware->data, fw->firmware->size); --------------E4D2F68B98824868CFAF1C68--