Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4DBC4360F for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28EA2082C for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727327AbfCEIhh (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 03:37:37 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:39147 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726026AbfCEIhh (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 03:37:37 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id o6so8161352qtk.6; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:37:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tnxnpf8kZGLiuVVHIrOVQ0i6UzbMU+wg4g+ni8NrgX0=; b=I+u51rCzqLTUtlcOck4FuxmhcHZIttVACAJrxlacdIDN1dsRXgTlIztus/xj4SKrsP PRtYXZREauVXrNTwjNhRFst8edeurp997+fAtw8IChx7oEEYN0/M8xm53P4SHJPejYbl fC3BezjrwXD/1d6x+RfGppQd0PaV22oCcKJvJDHjAw0oeI5jpNZDIjbRUO+MFSIZczYy eILnmqWzRa4ynka7V8kifE7F4cUfJ/zVFT0/kPsZdnuNs5SzYrGiLcWsKsH22/+6TBJz TnNsHHBPNPeWiZKzPGyIKTAZes6lMZw19WfEZcjvyjCfzM793CgwfoINVrX+HY4iN+R1 mzoA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4JzVhjgtH01mwCLIVIbRr8V6eIUsJqfTjj8GvHCPElpVHCsCh /AYnBDZ2I+PVDLX6e0QsXd49qnr6ssz2IpcUjVw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6K6Vl8MPjob+tIas8+HkU2jqa8boSAVFD1SP3GUddIF+PzfNcNEvI6J08dmi/hYi09EH1UCRaHheVPoCmBbs= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b758:: with SMTP id q24mr1160498qve.149.1551775056617; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:37:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190304203924.2111146-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:37:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: fix 64-bit division To: Luciano Coelho Cc: Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , Intel Linux Wireless , Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Avraham Stern , linux-wireless , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:44 AM Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 21:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This was already fixed with this patch: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10823267/ > > ...but it hasn't reached the mainline yet. > > I'm planning to send it to the v5.1-rc series as soon as the merge > window closes. Is that quick enough for you? That's fine, I just want it to reach 5.1 so it does not regress against 5.0. Sorry for the slightly bad timing of my submission. I had just restarted my randconfig tests the other day and wanted to get my 60 new patches out as quickly as possible. Arnd