Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D654C43381 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B71208E4 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552065870; bh=h9mQEtiMtqksTqdyqnT4w/SwH5auu5osAE1/Zv9Nonk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=NCLl7wP5m/sJRSmKZrk7RGss4i816Sg0cKmHAUX3hwa1yX7hpAf/1g1841Yo081mB XkAP3YsYoRV66PjYZKhzzVaHFT6VwRVPMna6DsiF5pdm5w0Au0stnsBF2Uv9H9L/Zw pvgKQ2dRciZ7b/i24VkgXFjsaX1CLQ+Pw/6fCQ6U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726480AbfCHRY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:24:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32772 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726418AbfCHRY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:24:29 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35E2D20851; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:24:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552065868; bh=h9mQEtiMtqksTqdyqnT4w/SwH5auu5osAE1/Zv9Nonk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W/Ru9wLM24OXbieL9VS896+hUBo8hvsFwpAm2Pncotzi3995JcEwoLFMpzTrj74Lu gBCjKrG1rk0DXYE+iU0dBoCHjuWweyVOElykeCHpxZBX7F6Wr+hYiseAWsaPuDvakB S0lL1m7rAkPgJnVLjxvqrCJmxjw97KvNzHKrmIsA= Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:24:26 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Larry Finger Cc: yhchuang@realtek.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, sgruszka@redhat.com, pkshih@realtek.com, tehuang@realtek.com, briannorris@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/14] staging: rtlwifi: remove staging rtlwifi driver Message-ID: <20190308172426.GA20723@kroah.com> References: <1552053343-6513-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <1552053343-6513-15-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20190308140619.GE25768@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:20:11AM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > On 3/8/19 8:06 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:55:43PM +0800, yhchuang@realtek.com wrote: > > > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > > > > > > The rtlwifi driver is conflicting with Realtek's new 802.11ac chip > > > series driver rtw88, remove it to avoid racing with the same ID. > > > > > > The rtw88 driver can be found at drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88 > > > > The only objection I have here is that your new driver does not support > > all of the devices that this driver does. So why not just rip out the > > PCI stuff for the staging driver until the USB/SDIO code gets added to > > the new one, and then you can drop the rest of this code? > > Greg, > > The staging driver only supports PCI ID 0x10ec:0xB822, whereas the new one > supports that ID plus 0x10ec:0xC822. There will not be any devices dropped > when the staging code is deleted as long as the new driver is added. Ah, ok, all of those "*usb*" files in that driver directory lied :) If there's no regression of devices, then I have no objection to this: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman thanks, greg k-h