Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C3BC43381 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A595B2070D for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="jTYLQRTb"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="nQHtRkCC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727050AbfCMGsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:48:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:39634 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726995AbfCMGsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:48:36 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F005609EF; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:48:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552459715; bh=dvBL5wXDc6zXnbUKNND4HWxxULOGegqR0cMwlzCuuzY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jTYLQRTbVLfOxEpMtErnCPtPSa3FfN4jxP0nlwiaeL04YZielNlwzZqvcJzWjDGjy hvmPkI7VAjN20nf7Ri/WmgQ0MUhDhf2vLCMUqtREIuFNcGOn4M/OnxBIelLTSwNrFB 6gjke+pxrEfDJwL+/VmimP+sP7tqlokcAemgC/ss= Received: from x230.qca.qualcomm.com (85-76-44-132-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.44.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5042C6019F; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:48:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552459713; bh=dvBL5wXDc6zXnbUKNND4HWxxULOGegqR0cMwlzCuuzY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nQHtRkCC2bpgmFAh+WSUau0D80Re+MHs2OZWVVKQ8Th1zjX+2/drRfN3h1GfXyOXN ThyoV5fCeXPhzVQ5JkCvlSzBQzNos4cwEGp9kGSAfv6ePHTqsxqqLASwUhUKeAxcnA 0A1Py9ONp9XDmxnBVNlHex9pB5DE9Wan7ztu1Fuw= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 5042C6019F Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] rtw88: mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips References: <1552450443-351-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:48:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1552450443-351-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> (yhchuang@realtek.com's message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:13:49 +0800") Message-ID: <87wol31d8k.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org writes: > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > > This is a new mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips. > rtw88 now supports RTL8822BE/RTL8822CE now, with basic station mode > functionalities. The firmware for both can be found at linux-firmware. > [...] > v8 > > - add prefix "rtw_" to *_rates and corresponding *_sizes, otherwise > the extern will confuse the linker there are multiple definitions > with brcmsmac driver I tried to explain this already last time, but maybe I wasn't clear enough so I'll try again: PLEASE do not submit any new versions of rtw88 until I explicitly ask you to send v9. If you post new versions too frequently it makes the review harder. Reviewing full driver is very different from reviewing normal patches, the patches are larger and it takes more time to review. Also you did not switch to using GENMASK() like I asked. So no more new versions of rtw88 until everyone have reviewed v8 and I ask you to send v9. -- Kalle Valo