Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0ABC10F06 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229E2070D for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="PQgeYpo0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727767AbfCNOCQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:02:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com ([209.85.210.65]:39612 "EHLO mail-ot1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727739AbfCNOCQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:02:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id e15so5181031otk.6 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:02:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MHP1SZor194V0kCI+jE0/Ee6nEZn6VNuv1Gr6BdyO2A=; b=PQgeYpo0mOWKdDy6iNXjp0A4gfhf57NHJZbWJYtwsQmkVI2L6iaXREycCjgg8RySlo 6iauDqJPkKxeAG13QtC/RzcnvHCCywDvwIlsB8qG8WdB7Lx6MIXcfxK25bTWnlj6a5Qj XiE3bnjieIzAY9rCdu74FP4AR5yoF41Jr+b/5yySY3Qh9ssJDnVkZU22JgvtbONygOey jd9l8KbUg0lGg54m6U8lNGVI+7y5ZKt023c/8AT5uaAlH3FHCW1A1Cch2LCIRdbrOggD hcQZUG3i150ulHk8JqdghlzNLsLyvFT8qbaPmYyZhfMDSB32T6wYRmzBcKuGyXRara5N D/qQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MHP1SZor194V0kCI+jE0/Ee6nEZn6VNuv1Gr6BdyO2A=; b=quKMwePY0ErrraW0mc3Nmmyi3HcVVYW2ec43Mjmsy6Kl2iWmcfqsjxXw5EpncuEDVC JzFSG2n+cF2ZsYfJyOjU2G9WBF1PssOS3eZhKbpYCYjCQphpWnUvzfx8wsvDp4E4qsjU ZeYBdoC9dAI3O/i8LDWu6o4N2e2J0SBhskKiUqo8rhCumQ+zBbTmtiv48OuJWNzFFIKq KWSuRiyu5Ysm+BTEPfbD0LUduda1fDXxj+jcteikd3jVUTfJ/uhIZxiVa8bByA7/SeDs GtKUFKJ7P2XJ3VGqItD04xFipRz6z8qBqlcGsSqV43ZpqsegYFJPaAfo33Qr5UR6fYnm /3xA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX91/lte5idFnBeXPUu7ipQv9i2C4515MCKocdc7Ik5PQwKsVHj 1BWum6NyLJGcp2067GIg+Y3HKVau5wruCz6rDF0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyuIxfU4Ov0wia4vXRGWjhtR9OpwYisYg7fnEVaDhDIYx9LgKJnXT/LWXJKa2laTBCH9+RbegO676g+kv5tvt0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7515:: with SMTP id r21mr6981388otk.322.1552572134968; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:02:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:6a97:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:02:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190313155028.GB5302@redhat.com> References: <1552417902-11040-1-git-send-email-pozega.tomislav@gmail.com> <1552417902-11040-2-git-send-email-pozega.tomislav@gmail.com> <20190313091252.GB2663@redhat.com> <20190313130910.GD2003@redhat.com> <20190313140607.GE2003@redhat.com> <20190313155028.GB5302@redhat.com> From: Tom Psyborg Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:02:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rt2x00: enable experimental MFP with HW crypt To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, daniel@makrotopia.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 13/03/2019, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > There should be no difference between enabling MFP with nohwcrypt and > without nohwcrypt, well there is. do you still want me to resend this with MFP enabled unconditionally for all chips?