Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC6C43381 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F8920872 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727241AbfCQWi1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:38:27 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:54656 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725914AbfCQWi1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:38:27 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-RC5) (envelope-from ) id 1h5eQC-0006s0-2z; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:38:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mac80211_hwsim: Ext Key ID support (NATIVE) From: Johannes Berg To: Alexander Wetzel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:38:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190316204208.16497-6-alexander@wetzel-home.de> References: <20190316204208.16497-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de> <20190316204208.16497-6-alexander@wetzel-home.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Since I'm travelling to netdev and all, I'm not sure I'll actually get around to this patchset soon. On Sat, 2019-03-16 at 21:42 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote: > Driver is not supporting hardware encryption and therefore fully > compatible with Extended Key ID. On this particular patch now reading this I'm wondering if we shouldn't just do that in mac80211 if there's no set_key callback? I suspect that'd affect a few drivers that are otherwise more or less orphaned. johannes