Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8D1C43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772C42085A for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 02:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gjS65iVs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727244AbfCSCh2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:37:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:34121 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727030AbfCSCh2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:37:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r19so16373508otn.1 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:37:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hngMdJ9dLq62MKzrhHinT5XoCXsHjtG5akXdXLZQkNw=; b=gjS65iVsTnYyPpmHXupXVC7q5bXphbvTi1dZcEH0mRmz4NN1jq4k0ZojSE9bOREvft ZXZyP/vmcXt8VNvYIM+PIq/Hh6KvvA4hfosTjJ5E3ynYoRigpAMm9hkC9TA5MMi+Cs1+ Gb1pWKthCDsHfU7woUfXUUVYzOsLalpzUDgSmEUeqSE9x+EXprqRuKMG7Lxxw/gH1B47 Krv8yHHYzouPvAbLLS3H8yTt58F0apWjuRTyMUfRDBgrXjWKLa+iFE94iKUq0Wou5Ioh g8BO8nmhWWxP7npI44HQISzpeCt5KM6mYYa0C4tBGt7yaOHduJ1bcp3FO461RZzOUNxp sdkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hngMdJ9dLq62MKzrhHinT5XoCXsHjtG5akXdXLZQkNw=; b=roaMKKXieRx+uLkTJ7c7V8iBXs9y6xUmDaFFWnmvkGw3I1VfOQs//faMLVoJhWVz4M w7QI+X5WEeoIuqYmkFOKgfvwoHuohFMiikqJxTYu+cPI/P56omwpo8ewc2t2ibU39OEj ujz6vYzVX+MINvdsGXjgBN42Q/0WrFH5b3sidJVV+yvs4vGFHZQTC9fmpOghqoOS0D9f eyDAbH53eiEw63APBL9nSjJtpk7luNhqhFfj+ifn3wpUCMZuWMPlrGN1pQEEabQtwgwa dUJ+Cdc9i/9cAOEkIkgsiY2t1ImEAdRXo1m50tjP8hC2R7DavJ9UVl1Q4RG3WaX/r1KO SF0A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGmIruQ4I/XE1QWqiaCCN54tmHMZ+6ttMcI8u61y0E6VwlVy/6 JrvjNSIm5mKy7gfVwSLcrprlYafmTvM+ySYgcJA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+t5WBCrZwaL6ONk0BrEeu0FZdddbuHNSznmJ4rUxGc4dsTJm7qUK0UOrYQbAQjVtwIVpk7tuHkOqRbj36UnE= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6e0a:: with SMTP id e10mr7749843otr.281.1552963047868; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:37:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:628c:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:37:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190209172825.GB19297@makrotopia.org> References: <20181227102535.GA25885@redhat.com> <20190102081934.GA5300@redhat.com> <20190209110259.GA14900@redhat.com> <20190209115628.GA16082@redhat.com> <20190209153850.GA19297@makrotopia.org> <20190209172825.GB19297@makrotopia.org> From: Tom Psyborg Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 03:37:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] rt2x00: do not print error when queue is full To: Daniel Golle Cc: Kalle Valo , Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Randy Oostdyk , Felix Fietkau , Mathias Kresin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 09/02/2019, Daniel Golle wrote: >>20MiB/s download rate is very impressive for 2.4GHz WiFi, I never saw > anything even near that (using BitTorrent I get up to 8MiB/s when next > to the router in low-noise environment with proprietry ubiquiti gear). various apps and data transfer stacks may add significant overhead. for real throughput testing i rely on iperf2 (tried iperf3 it was mess). if interested take a look at bandwidth achieved on OCed QCA9531 device: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/different-wifi-speed-tx-rx-archer-c7-v2/18860/10?u=psyborg