Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E31C43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86C2085A for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727528AbfCSQEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:04:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35134 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726612AbfCSQEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:04:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9134307C940; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-101.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.101]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB1E28991; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:04:27 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , nbd@nbd.name, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] mt76: usb: reduce locking in mt76u_tx_tasklet Message-ID: <20190319160426.GA15616@redhat.com> References: <1ee5ce7818f9d45c9713ce99e810cb84f50dcf03.1552907276.git.lorenzo@kernel.org> <20190319110708.GA5360@redhat.com> <20190319125812.GA21821@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190319125812.GA21821@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 01:58:13PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:09:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > Similar to pci counterpart, reduce locking in mt76u_tx_tasklet since > > > q->head is managed just in mt76u_tx_tasklet and q->queued is updated > > > holding q->lock > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi > > > --- > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c > > > index ac03acdae279..8cd70c32d77a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/usb.c > > > @@ -634,29 +634,33 @@ static void mt76u_tx_tasklet(unsigned long data) > > > int i; > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) { > > > + u32 n_queued = 0, n_sw_queued = 0; > > > + > > > sq = &dev->q_tx[i]; > > > q = sq->q; > > > > > > - spin_lock_bh(&q->lock); > > > - while (true) { > > > + while (q->queued > n_queued) { > > > buf = &q->entry[q->head].ubuf; > > > - if (!buf->done || !q->queued) > > > + if (!buf->done) > > > break; > > > > I'm still thinking if this is safe or not. Is somewhat tricky to > > read variable outside the lock because in such case there is no time > > guarantee when variable written on one CPU gets updated value on > > different CPU. And for USB is not only q->queued but also buf->done. > > Hi Stanislaw, > > I was wondering if this is safe as well, but q->queued is updated holding q->lock > and I guess it will ensure to not overlap tx and status code path. Overlap will not happen, at worst what can happen is q->queued will be smaller on tx_tasklet than on tx_queue_skb. > Regarding buf->done, it is already updated without holding the lock in mt76u_complete_tx That's actually a bug, but it's not important, if tx_tasklet will not see updated buf->done <- true value by mt76u_complete_tx on different cpu, it will not complete skb. It will be done on next tx_tasklet iteration. Worse thing would be opposite situation. Stanislaw