Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834BCC10F03 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5250F2183E for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Xy1ZClP4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727925AbfCVPrN (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:47:13 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com ([209.85.167.196]:46510 "EHLO mail-oi1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727244AbfCVPrN (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:47:13 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id x188so2022678oia.13; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:47:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yw6foJsGwWELoKTF1wCnhUr8FwBtYg2gy4HXb/JJ/6g=; b=Xy1ZClP4cZ2LWIjWXgolJNUmDJlIL9pDmDwdkp8a1H1g4nrxE56mDUbHD2+TibYyOi xWXVzqRy7zMVsHIe/bdI7ojCwYoJv8yevuGwgal5g3YSJUaXn+IXQNl/X0O5MocAFeFJ MlCxf+0bd2MVjLhgJLVogm2U44IxUfNJZL6rOjydjBKDXHrbSQ5zV0PDlLL2K3IMaCeA wdfkTsbRQWMzGCDGNmtoAal8c35c9gjoR0ZPsqDJYv6IIrLhEIXxosCC6bWoqW4VSgKm cFxA21J495rLUwkpPx7YapSoc0Amnb+yBeZ/VfCBoHpMl8lhKJDXGD4iSE5iGgnvZsxk e6Ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yw6foJsGwWELoKTF1wCnhUr8FwBtYg2gy4HXb/JJ/6g=; b=ZRkfD/7FCYDm9IubmDlJoIEjSPaLf/APguMeV/j3llR3ZSEzmrQ8pLI5paNFbfT56m 8IxTm+5QH8lFuYoPuELDXZxMqgBgKYjntb/1K5L5FvxoR/Jfsiyhcfiag6yfsL64Q+h8 jiZi5f/Xx3dAWmbVBDsqdBO6+PPv98K3uzh4blpvS/R54iOvLQGd5xst4Omo1BjtpF4u fWq7fPHPmzoqusYGzD6vvBOBfkTBVcnXRr7B88IaT6Oeph3V1KvYDs9rXzgx1HhDvpaG 9480XO6zRdCT6rOhlXQiRUTRJeXJPImQFa9yUhaD+crCAYUcADW37TNFGUCkllRBVg30 SDJA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXw1lcSffLo691CG1HWPjL0lUZrF0aYxEpjVskDJWWkUkZj/ZCC EwTwHZoaMz7UXezFC8CwJqfmzDQ/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZSpPqajZbDwjkRpYELZz+3VkPHlaC5JG6XY+HYrSMXKdEBiJ6VQtsvpSh+Tp8vuKtKKkzfA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c782:: with SMTP id x124mr2357328oif.61.1553269631998; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (cpe-24-31-245-230.kc.res.rr.com. [24.31.245.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p187sm3144838oif.17.2019.03.22.08.47.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: shut up clang -Wuninitialized variable warning To: Arnd Bergmann , Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Priit Laes Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190322143725.1332353-1-arnd@arndb.de> From: Larry Finger Message-ID: <758d6087-bd8c-a60f-919a-40c170f7b23c@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:47:10 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190322143725.1332353-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 3/22/19 9:37 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Clang warns about what is clearly a case of passing an uninitalized > variable into a static function: > > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1852:23: error: variable 'gains' is uninitialized when used here > [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] > lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30); > ^~~~~ > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1838:2: note: variable 'gains' is declared here > struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains; > ^ > 1 error generated. > > However, this function is empty, and its arguments are never evaluated, > so gcc in contrast does not warn here. Both compilers behave in a > reasonable way as far as I can tell, so we should change the code > to avoid the warning everywhere. > > We could just eliminate the lpphy_papd_cal() function entirely, > given that it has had the TODO comment in it for 10 years now > and is rather unlikely to ever get done. I'm doing a simpler > change here, and just pass the 'oldgains' variable in that has > been initialized, based on the guess that this is what was > originally meant. > > Fixes: 2c0d6100da3e ("b43: LP-PHY: Begin implementing calibration & software RFKILL support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > index 46408a560814..aedee026c5e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > @@ -1835,7 +1835,7 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, > static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev) > { > struct b43_phy_lp *lpphy = dev->phy.lp; > - struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains; > + struct lpphy_tx_gains oldgains; > int old_txpctl, old_afe_ovr, old_rf, old_bbmult; > > lpphy_read_tx_pctl_mode_from_hardware(dev); > @@ -1849,9 +1849,9 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev) > lpphy_set_tx_power_control(dev, B43_LPPHY_TXPCTL_OFF); > > if (dev->dev->chip_id == 0x4325 && dev->dev->chip_rev == 0) > - lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30); > + lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 30); > else > - lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 65); > + lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 65); > > if (old_afe_ovr) > lpphy_set_tx_gains(dev, oldgains); > Acked-by: Larry Finger Thanks. I will submit a patch that removes lpphy_papd_cal(). You are correct that it is unlikely ever to be implemented. Larry