Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A196C4360F for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A35021900 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="P5uBFY21" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728164AbfCVQGT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:06:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:36192 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727778AbfCVQGT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:06:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id e4so2130443edi.3; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yqr048Vn5eeLffA+DI+RO2WyyaqgT7iEICWrTrJZlkM=; b=P5uBFY212XyWizZTdLRlR+7W4Wjqk4xpy5TdhySjmzpwuNVuzCYtLo0aItEs5/Dk5a /r2j7umJ1grqenbNJrdXKPC4ss4/zgsrTXJkGKmVh607i+Noatw0nRmUVcQCxx4aSOl3 TNHbqDMDeci4jT68qabGBD5ekM+Wlt1qtDh70dHnddEesCinQ5GhOToWdD33RtYcjnC6 lLhnRQW0Khe/kS8mZLz5ANtsrknDphYjN6wQNx2VnUA+ahcnwcGX7+79GeJxIo4p3j53 ihT5A5zTlCIJaHOrnm5kmt7gMZoiuau3BHm2ULiOYl6UEQMDoCihmWN6IetYbjcf5JGr 6zow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yqr048Vn5eeLffA+DI+RO2WyyaqgT7iEICWrTrJZlkM=; b=XhYs86KOsMfBiLmS+Z66buWerC/XfgWwc1kjEeeWTU6/IGf06SpeH5KQaU35AnjqlC 1o0mj1R7Bgl8d6Ap5f8zwHgVrGjIIrfcZnustHBXzeWZHtHnIEiWigsw9KN7xf2lnJH8 rIyniuFPAMA5T+HnkeT2o6pYb34JT+UgpcJGQd1ZP84nhoLXhEENGex50S/wfX4spVd1 cGWFKFSApaFKpB+izdKOz7QtjNB0YV/REZulENlXwMEERXnblXNfcE6D2yHTZhGND2LJ JU7KST1UWViJttVckaHSwbl252fZ0imKagOwUw5ft0rvRoOnxTjH1WOGpn3xzdNo574d T04A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4BdvZiGVXtpsvI8TmDdibHK6qjsnPmBH4AOukGXe6RragC2Kf 52qbvONNAnm/seeDU8eFisk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgXmLut7voRGM8MXDXlgSfIZz7Um6YPNl3UbKycrC0Gh2ZWO6Sej7lEjOiibIRhLnEiEwyrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:92b2:: with SMTP id k47mr6608911eda.148.1553270776816; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archlinux-ryzen ([2a01:4f9:2a:1fae::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm2869910edk.14.2019.03.22.09.06.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:06:14 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Larry Finger , Priit Laes , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: shut up clang -Wuninitialized variable warning Message-ID: <20190322160614.GF21978@archlinux-ryzen> References: <20190322143725.1332353-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190322143725.1332353-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:37:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Clang warns about what is clearly a case of passing an uninitalized > variable into a static function: > > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1852:23: error: variable 'gains' is uninitialized when used here > [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] > lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30); > ^~~~~ > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1838:2: note: variable 'gains' is declared here > struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains; > ^ > 1 error generated. > > However, this function is empty, and its arguments are never evaluated, > so gcc in contrast does not warn here. Both compilers behave in a > reasonable way as far as I can tell, so we should change the code > to avoid the warning everywhere. > > We could just eliminate the lpphy_papd_cal() function entirely, > given that it has had the TODO comment in it for 10 years now > and is rather unlikely to ever get done. I'm doing a simpler > change here, and just pass the 'oldgains' variable in that has > been initialized, based on the guess that this is what was > originally meant. > > Fixes: 2c0d6100da3e ("b43: LP-PHY: Begin implementing calibration & software RFKILL support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor > --- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > index 46408a560814..aedee026c5e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c > @@ -1835,7 +1835,7 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, > static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev) > { > struct b43_phy_lp *lpphy = dev->phy.lp; > - struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains; > + struct lpphy_tx_gains oldgains; > int old_txpctl, old_afe_ovr, old_rf, old_bbmult; > > lpphy_read_tx_pctl_mode_from_hardware(dev); > @@ -1849,9 +1849,9 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev) > lpphy_set_tx_power_control(dev, B43_LPPHY_TXPCTL_OFF); > > if (dev->dev->chip_id == 0x4325 && dev->dev->chip_rev == 0) > - lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30); > + lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 30); > else > - lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 65); > + lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 65); > > if (old_afe_ovr) > lpphy_set_tx_gains(dev, oldgains); > -- > 2.20.0 >