Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC61C43381 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F00218A6 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="pG27VudW"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="G6dLAxSy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730248AbfC3GIk (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2019 02:08:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35054 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730047AbfC3GIk (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2019 02:08:40 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B56B96081E; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:08:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1553926119; bh=uXFMR+qQ9MU1kXbyJWeI2UPOE12YR3MK/gLmhHknfsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pG27VudWOPROS0WJ0x2m9PapF2RQ/H5iS0S0HhHaubvU3JdUJ/abyywVsaZnry962 4W+XUBHCA9WmOsh19yYcBUn8/BhQDfWr6pVcHxhpUuiSrdvT4XuhXHeS5d31hG3aG0 WglOWQoZ7h9iSidmLYfaZiKk+R422XW7JBNdntLw= Received: from purkki.adurom.net (purkki.adurom.net [80.68.90.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D72E6602BA; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 06:08:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1553926118; bh=uXFMR+qQ9MU1kXbyJWeI2UPOE12YR3MK/gLmhHknfsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=G6dLAxSy0iTsACn2xZjIW2DBDEY8R0KTpAeswWRh5VPySi7GVai5eo900YbEdWskt N/Zce4Sd/gQA57khC0SIMmnGKZzekgjCpNynIfBOBAejHda4wF0wH9yRl1CG1MVMGl XrjyE4C4Zn82l5+sbUuDpn30TRjvI5O3fDvofm38= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org D72E6602BA Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Ryder Lee Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau , Roy Luo , Sean Wang , Nelson Chang , YF Luo , Kai Lin , Rorscha Yang , Kyle Lee , Miller Shen , Haipin Liang , , , , Lorenzo Bianconi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mt76: add mac80211 driver for MT7615 PCIe-based chipsets References: <2849359e0b0ede6c13ae9f142aff77a016fd0a80.1553607739.git.ryder.lee@mediatek.com> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:08:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2849359e0b0ede6c13ae9f142aff77a016fd0a80.1553607739.git.ryder.lee@mediatek.com> (Ryder Lee's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:28:07 +0800") Message-ID: <87lg0wyjvj.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Ryder Lee writes: > This driver is for a newer generation of MediaTek MT7615 4x4 802.11ac > PCIe-based chipsets, which support wave2 MU-MIMO up to 4 users/group > and also support up to 160MHz bandwidth. > > The driver fully supports AP, station and monitor mode. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee > Signed-off-by: Roy Luo > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi [...] > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7615/dma.c > @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 mt76 is under ISC so why did you choose GPLv2 here? I don't think it's a good idea to use different licenses within the same driver. Also mt76 does not use SPDX tags yet. I would prefer that the whole driver is converted in one go to have consistent licensing information. -- Kalle Valo