Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 17:10:29 +0800
From:   Yibo Zhao <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
        Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: remove warning message
In-Reply-To: <7c92f5cf51eaec1d5449698d90f5b6c5ca6c2bea.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <1557824507-17668-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org>
 (sfid-20190514_110314_752671_7E53E9A2)
 <7c92f5cf51eaec1d5449698d90f5b6c5ca6c2bea.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Message-ID: <ccb48284f0d96e72f4c041e12c943f0a@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-05-14 17:05, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 17:01 +0800, Yibo Zhao wrote:
>> In multiple SSID cases, it takes time to prepare every AP interface
>> to be ready in initializing phase. If a sta already knows everything 
>> it
>> needs to join one of the APs and sends authentication to the AP which
>> is not fully prepared at this point of time, AP's channel context
>> could be NULL. As a result, warning message occurs.
>> 
> Err, what was the point in sending v2 without any changes?
> 
> johannes
Hi Johannes,

I was planning to use WARN_ON_ONCE() in the first place to replace 
WARN_ON() then after some discussion, we think removing it could be 
better. So the first patch was based on my first version which is sent 
incorrectly. Please check again.

Sorry for the confusing.


-- 
Yibo