Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp4997845ybi; Tue, 28 May 2019 06:04:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXda+fUfOb6q8k1gvg18p4wudQLiLnWVVEfLTF5lkoxiem+kdW5MN+KKpKTjrz4FLHEEkS X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2525:: with SMTP id j34mr5745054pje.122.1559048647948; Tue, 28 May 2019 06:04:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559048647; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uAGE5ijs3G0A/M7ZPG+KhIdBrKlj6xe8VrDhIcrByMS5HW3CiQmJ0UG2f3F8sZsydZ yxX6SYAAZyT0axedLJOWtw2PH3R2139UNLqTAk9Rccv8kg3OPvq6xyi8Dgx6zakHEwf9 T4lwuOQ5bFN/ozO2Wrw90en5Gag3KXq0xHJJYeAnli0J3mxAJ/zHtPUaZKdc8oSjMcxZ PdRzU4pQYSnvrpqmKenU6U7xV6lZj+Cyil+0ST5wNLIif5yWl7PC/yisRNSmV7vVwHlx bEkro9CREtwUDqDY33JP9yTScwDOUVESLRqpy7UkAc7rKLa/Bt/S1OECO5GAUXPfONnA w2ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=nyuMvCRbSUhq6xRTrLcgr4MhHdrWBhaLhwL3jkImdAk=; b=cmHdwXPHuDGZychvuLcZNzQj2qjCPNGil+22gSBlVAJcv3EhLbOivFgf5eV6HJWm5T ZXJXLq0B3AJ5skXb/iqqJYhJ+BEsRldf5AGjk1gllazTHtwk2ds29AjTpuiR6jcfxJao UtRolNi0p+ZFWN6Ru+qr/ue0QV5YAnKWatHUJ7VDgjsc43JR/SiipODPUyzuuALOcAIr 7Fj59KYypKbQLLDPNcP4GJvP29IPRSrG7z4mRVYm2vBMrH6AkRVUQdmVtjXefH1PQhfe 6du+SKMOsH7iEqYaFXaiPwReXxnjWH2kdz7Txngb6d1+vHyIZRkpPVm0qupzCgK4mKNN RrCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJr6nC6w; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5si3382689pjk.68.2019.05.28.06.03.27; Tue, 28 May 2019 06:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kJr6nC6w; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727414AbfE1NA3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 May 2019 09:00:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:40262 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726870AbfE1NA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 09:00:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u11so17624135otq.7; Tue, 28 May 2019 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyuMvCRbSUhq6xRTrLcgr4MhHdrWBhaLhwL3jkImdAk=; b=kJr6nC6wrPy5BVs3UbPGlGOpYy1mOQInAXwlimyLqnlUIpPK00WuQlilHm9ZkotRJV h1pimdnhh82LoIBRfEUIipy8n2O6qQ0YczA6pgyJoYpGCUygXY678yviVL4fhVkEUgsz +8nfHCoTn/OZjMT7tRrLdZOZ6h61WdEqz8i77woSak5lD9Htc1qXqrRmxKs87NU0T2WV wL0IhC4phxSDwOZ/F2mSVY1uRh7Yc5oaTTly+R19n72jm1/Ap7RexNayfL0Oyrut/+3O e4LNIHxFNNQWMXrXIunt+Fz6Mc6Rle4hsvX8CsJoaw5qoAcy6fsz3uQIhJnaq72WOnwM K9Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyuMvCRbSUhq6xRTrLcgr4MhHdrWBhaLhwL3jkImdAk=; b=p8+ow/gAXKTF/Wd+1yFRaYTFItFLifLRC5qz7uXHLj7/jYh7957QuZtv5bHWxUvveF /pmgE8kmZwbPApDAlmTz7c7qSDFLs+VxKFwxPL5/7XaL7qdceqqACfObMeiofQb8VB6e SH/k2VTKA6sp7GMvYzeEmv3qyRw8mMDjyqt03yWAFpOLH6rRlqeGhoRaG8GgTBC38OuS xmeTZQ8kxDDcBAiMtmXMAOTjw4nBqWs0DUnPBX14Sg/v7ZDbNYj/mEqGpfOAMdVKRl/U Vdl9c14N2/qGQUcE1H0VnSa2R1oXFVC6O9QParxv3YU6FwwWvW3dgmXA+ZbCEjHXJTvs v7/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOKQTyWCC1EmkL5+0kIn4QN4ZXgSid5w6WX4TSjaPwFpPYvaaF /RE6887t6bc3q5P858kPN4x/ramx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1692:: with SMTP id k18mr53205otr.73.1559048426883; Tue, 28 May 2019 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (cpe-24-31-245-230.kc.res.rr.com. [24.31.245.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm5385458otb.66.2019.05.28.06.00.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 May 2019 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: Fix null-pointer dereferences in error handling code of rtl_pci_probe() To: Kalle Valo , Jia-Ju Bai Cc: pkshih@realtek.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190514123439.10524-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> <20190528115555.301E760F3C@smtp.codeaurora.org> From: Larry Finger Message-ID: <2658b691-b992-b773-c6cf-85801adc479f@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 08:00:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190528115555.301E760F3C@smtp.codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 5/28/19 6:55 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > >> *BUG 1: >> In rtl_pci_probe(), when rtlpriv->cfg->ops->init_sw_vars() fails, >> rtl_deinit_core() in the error handling code is executed. >> rtl_deinit_core() calls rtl_free_entries_from_scan_list(), which uses >> rtlpriv->scan_list.list in list_for_each_entry_safe(), but it has been >> initialized. Thus a null-pointer dereference occurs. >> The reason is that rtlpriv->scan_list.list is initialized by >> INIT_LIST_HEAD() in rtl_init_core(), which has not been called. >> >> To fix this bug, rtl_deinit_core() should not be called when >> rtlpriv->cfg->ops->init_sw_vars() fails. >> >> *BUG 2: >> In rtl_pci_probe(), rtl_init_core() can fail when rtl_regd_init() in >> this function fails, and rtlpriv->scan_list.list has not been >> initialized by INIT_LIST_HEAD(). Then, rtl_deinit_core() in the error >> handling code of rtl_pci_probe() is executed. Finally, a null-pointer >> dereference occurs due to the same reason of the above bug. >> >> To fix this bug, the initialization of lists in rtl_init_core() are >> performed before the call to rtl_regd_init(). >> >> These bugs are found by a runtime fuzzing tool named FIZZER written by >> us. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai > > Ping & Larry, is this ok to take? > Kalle, Not at the moment. In reviewing the code, I was unable to see how this situation could develop, and his backtrace did not mention any rtlwifi code. For that reason, I asked him to add printk stat4ements to show the last part of rtl_pci that executed correctly. In https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=155788322631134&w=2, he promised to do that, but I have not seen the result. Larry