Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To:     Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@codeaurora.org>
CC:     <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 18:07:26 +0200
Message-ID: <16b097efa48.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <d27aac46e682d6cb93ac97df0073818c@codeaurora.org>
References: <1558353645-18119-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
 <1558353645-18119-2-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
 <d27aac46e682d6cb93ac97df0073818c@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.20.0-1451 (build: 102000001)
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] nl80211: add 6GHz band definition to enum nl80211_band
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On May 30, 2019 4:53:13 PM Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> On 2019-05-20 05:00, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> [...snip...]
>>  enum nl80211_band {
>>  	NL80211_BAND_2GHZ,
>>  	NL80211_BAND_5GHZ,
>> +	NL80211_BAND_6GHZ,
>>  	NL80211_BAND_60GHZ,
>> 
>>  	NUM_NL80211_BANDS,
>
> Is it not a concern that this changes the value of NL80211_BAND_60GHZ
> and hence will break any ABI which expects the current value?

Sigh! Obviously that is a concern. Johannes already mentioned it.

Thanks,
Arend