Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp2581049ybi; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:33:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxiWSrALIqdL1SivZPsTkj9UitEUAbFOtkLSpUroEVHUnWnXL2dVWIrJwDQYXvVnRZAstxg X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9bc5:: with SMTP id b5mr10770776pjw.109.1560119585667; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:33:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560119585; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J7VZKjOmFLzqRhiBPZB7g6gg50+J+fmsQ+VB8htZrmV5S09KKByshAQbgDyp2M9uke D9yoypbmB9HmA/IBO08P8aTgs7Mgzy9ZxHeEBtGfLvSp1yp/iwb19r5HHCXT1axbtCE+ oZMhG/8W104wCxGx4iMiqwbw+GWR7z/iYBxHR4dqWEelRBO2XL/T2F1G/wr4MuwBG2zw XJPzAbLIyilDc7/6eSkmVtbDXFIH8HraTd4mkeRaw9cDQ53rvOfhYl16+k/Lzs/mvs/z 253P8WIP2i/MdwMJ2W0f2rNa6GhU7zY+SC+ebJQ8nnfFhsAl4MBKV4QIBbhvkquxXDLF L/9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=kXLbBB3hN8wlU2G7D3C4fUS+dS3GC+GmhPAd2HGB1GE=; b=bdaUtIDtCu6zcKDoHddFlZBP/m9DYoBudCfvwhP8HA8IVSFB8gbxnsWVscaPLtMgFg t3a93cnfdzAxJB/bd10spBA8nY7oixSU2xA1XC18oK6ippdzRl13Tk12+5MTCoC0F0th zZf9VLYpkX04WAdBETiAfjTNjs4ylxOiYyjWTEp61sb0NCjXH1aMDSmnbrOSKC4ksyUC YFKqUZXTQSX8zN2ScA3Hb3gXjCLNio5yynDBqEuluL27KxsylobeOsyQTykbDifxXH9U 5diJkjBBFztiYo6+SP54MJsGsFFu+rLV3pMKyxPLSIxeOV7BdjR7U/gkcQSgsRf3D7nm RVrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o4si8301438plb.274.2019.06.09.15.32.50; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 15:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729777AbfFIWbw (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:31:52 -0400 Received: from bues.ch ([80.190.117.144]:52170 "EHLO bues.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729304AbfFIWbw (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:31:52 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2063 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:31:50 EDT Received: by bues.ch with esmtpsa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ha5oX-0003kU-V0; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 23:57:21 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 23:57:11 +0200 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: H Buus Cc: Kalle Valo , Michael Chan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Should b44_init lead to WARN_ON in drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c:464? Message-ID: <20190609235711.481bbac9@wiggum> In-Reply-To: <946c86bf-7e90-a981-b9fc-757adb98adfa@hbuus.com> References: <946c86bf-7e90-a981-b9fc-757adb98adfa@hbuus.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/j1ztxFZ/t9QL4ize+KYtKmd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/j1ztxFZ/t9QL4ize+KYtKmd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:44:10 -0400 H Buus wrote: > I have an old 32 bit laptop with a BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX ethernet > controller. For every kernel from 4.19-rc1 going forward, I get a > warning and call trace within a few seconds of start up (see dmesg > snippet below). I have traced it to a specific commit (see commit > below). On the face of it, I would think it is a regression, but it > doesn't seem to cause a problem, since networking over ethernet is workin= g. This warning is not a problem. The commit just exposes a warning, that has always been there. I suggest we just remove the WARN_ON from ssb_gpio_init and ssb_gpio_unregister. I don't see a reason to throw a warning in that case. --=20 Michael --Sig_/j1ztxFZ/t9QL4ize+KYtKmd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEihRzkKVZOnT2ipsS9TK+HZCNiw4FAlz9gLcACgkQ9TK+HZCN iw4SdA//ckBMesNtmeE5ovBdzE4mhaRf4sSBmN2DP1ctMil/nhW5nH7jF5jtvqxL 1RMT7aS5TZ1B+h50Y4rxpG4DFeyQCobaDaoHhqcbmXQp/zVRCOSbyb10zd/GC1q4 pZyxwgOc58pCNseGB7PMTiAmZCdxbhUkdjFRwuadTdQ0QqFEzWhO5IN+YdT80T4W 4htUP8ZDcQoQkjWF/tt/0bGuMrQaloqRzLDLP9C/gvZT4R1Uc3csh4rdaRHZCKQ1 OHxj47DYID03hf3tYnxg4JptWUPuEsZQHSX3Tw/Y5IFf0LdznTKbSMfqvS0qkdxF d3U/ium0zqibJkeDcIpdUtWPPO353SMkaxYHV2KrWOnykG0cw9jhXevU+ZnmnAdy swLVoHwsr1HWzTcUAbEZoUeY//7X1JWlqE8VH47Fsk5f/lePhdfCsfuU3JKEdcCt ofgjpZbqR+8CY/rPMUxZ113vqLarFNNX6qaHYW0M35U7yu1SKw1wqpIFqwR8eXhN AKwX46sLv/VTTM4MUb55PqdU90hyQS03e5215d8OowqnIvPwLqCJh2nFKJq5disk nu19j2tPqrAyY5Q+2ts+BS6W3/aqZVrnK4OnJ+vyeYzE70dKgZ6MDYVyD1SzQhkZ VehX4/NZ4XHVXOxaRnfRdnq5uTl56j50VUDbBQFDIT5tyau8ZCU= =Br6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/j1ztxFZ/t9QL4ize+KYtKmd--