Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <c025150aad17bbe62595c4969ea2f53f009419d3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mac80211/ath11k: HE mesh support
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:10:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190612193510.29489-1-sven@narfation.org> (sfid-20190612_213642_840659_91049B7E)
References: <20190612193510.29489-1-sven@narfation.org>
         (sfid-20190612_213642_840659_91049B7E)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sven,

Two comments:

1) It seems to me that patches 1/2 really should be in opposite order,
   since you can't really claim HE mesh support in hwsim when you don't
   have it in mac80211?
   Or maybe I misunderstand?

2) This series breaks the wpas_mesh_max_peering wpa_supplicant/hwsim
   test, and I'm not sure why. Perhaps some length calculations are bad?

johannes