Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp532642ybl; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:51:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyFlYfnRq6Ke3TgMFVMuaX8S3XSYya9kFUon9Ljb3ntiwbN4IeikFuwQWwzKZpE1ONsW511 X-Received: by 2002:a62:26c4:: with SMTP id m187mr10140647pfm.49.1565772717145; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:51:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565772717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oQey86FlpfZG42O+Rm+SDHP/mew6S256G62+u2bdl1joHUwHBCL+FSq/lfqAijE/DI KZJzswufEPkqx2ESZmRL+QNeY9y3nvmlel123f369Q+KVlpXZWX1RjV09OWceNUSrafP 1BEgm2YxS1PR6KB9I8QQO9mupsDcQm502PBSy0ypJrO5lFK49Q0Y5mzZuza4bIt7/hmq Utb2/x0hPtGhKkDt1U26QOrGGEJU7gkFasi9nUknpIyssKxkiR1pW8EINyRIoy3aHKCn Gn0201zdJ0oKw9uYp2MCayHvEKTNPtjOScmmv5jGq7odMJhpCX3kOa75CIrOe27ZCVwZ nHHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4vhf21yvxoadX9gp0QYtwsy6TSI9OsKYaDPGVQo0G9k=; b=grKLAABczquygNpiLbkPOluDUPfrUD881P0IigNRM+2aWViAt8qeVPDhBmSYYdzVcg attT8eA3QzaU1rtfPHKjAKFdAER9pDP+RG5nCoobVZaroOEvWtF1iiAWXJAOeivMW405 jC9BnrKfU5okFG2SiZdLooWla0pKfBWa7yicJ9IT9oKOue+2QPNEQCVpEHsCyXn+eW8C zetn2tn1vPeLvqhbMyxnJM5GrxysWzq3hLssP26rvZAWn0H+6v8kWtV/pRnMsmUBsgDk vydd6yWfCrfKtcp6s6J8N7g5lfaAgPqzyzhGWavTkcPn6ummcfr7EXBVylEFQYLmUVa3 /ENQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d7si2308346pgf.377.2019.08.14.01.51.41; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726166AbfHNIuU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 04:50:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45720 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725861AbfHNIuU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 04:50:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9318B30083EE; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.205.151]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2720082201; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:50:19 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Emil Karlson Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ap mode regression in linux-5.3-rc1 in rt2800usb Message-ID: <20190814085018.GA29199@redhat.com> References: <20190813215000.6cc27ade@lettuce> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190813215000.6cc27ade@lettuce> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (cc linux-wireless mailing list) On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:50:00PM +0300, Emil Karlson wrote: > Greetings > > After upgrading my ap running rt2800usb to linux-5.3-rc1 I noticed an > unusual problem of not being able to connect to my ap with my android > devices (nexus7/flo and nexus5x/bullhead), from tcpdump it seemed ap > was receiving packets from the android devices after successful > association, but android devices were not seeing the dhcp replies. > > I reverted drivers/net/wireless/ralink to the state it is in v5.2.8 and > android clients can connect again normally. I did not explicitly set > watchdog parameter to any value. > > Do you have any insights or is this already fixed? Most likely is not fixed. We have those new commits in 5.3: 41a531ffa4c5 rt2x00usb: fix rx queue hang 0f47aeeada2a rt2800: do not enable watchdog by default e403fa31ed71 rt2x00: add restart hw 710e6cc1595e rt2800: do not nullify initialization vector data 09db3b000619 rt2800: add pre_reset_hw callback 759c5b599cf4 rt2800: initial watchdog implementation 2034afe4db4a rt2800: add helpers for reading dma done index 9f3e3323e996 rt2x00: allow to specify watchdog interval Most suspicious are 710e6cc1595e and 41a531ffa4c5 . Could you test by reverting one single commit on 5.3 (first 710e6cc1595e and if that not help 41a531ffa4c5) and check if it makes the problem gone? Stanislaw