Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <766f6d196106fa7ca6036b2ce20243e042d9168d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mac80211_hwsim: Register support for HE meshpoint
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:38:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3127506.552nsDcnha@bentobox> (sfid-20190813_132058_302926_3B8DB390)
References: <20190813063657.7544-1-sven@narfation.org>
         <20190813105549.GA26160@w1.fi> <3127506.552nsDcnha@bentobox>
         (sfid-20190813_132058_302926_3B8DB390)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

> > mesh_secure_ocv_mix_legacy
> > wpas_mesh_open_ht40
> > mesh_secure_ocv_mix_ht

> No, these also failed for me without the mac80211_hwsim patch [3] in a full 
> test run. And thus not analyzed further by me.

I also see these fail if (and only if) I have this patch applied.

I'm going to drop this patch (again) for now, even if the situation is
now better I still don't want to knowingly break things there.

Please resend once that's all sorted out.

johannes