Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp551334ybl; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwA92ffPuqy9tKIjGw2Y4J4jS/nZHKn6i36zajvOKyXtDhe1CtsrK/0LMRh/B3BVuA6BEwh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:30d:: with SMTP id 13mr15195936pld.284.1567162161828; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:49:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567162161; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NXIrvjFOREoMIwX4k/XP6n/KB2lBdBvZ+ZQe60hD2NLIWn4CNplhM6kR10hcpoiUeq Wv841FmESTonPd0FhbDBNL5e7i2nQa3OCovQ/1iKm1Q6f/pGbY2gkWtNVxAiL0zhcrO1 UdJMVpgBrv2e5klsC8qTx0wOJ2uwGsB9YOx33iys5oZ1FwnLlZ47nMSSCK+i/bKMrQQk deBUhwTBy2lHo05jBGs1UMyYv7frR/EJMowZumU1K31UiIsmF0euJQ423kcd0ijSKNGi bdaCWQTQHDDZ62oKbaiUrnQjq1aQxaas5bGTXOaRlBeR7kKJ1tuc7iC2Nb8OTFKVwkOu uOtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=w4qOpnt62aq+wVRBXcBJWkrU0lBkUdEejqu72jE0m4A=; b=nlrMN79XUEEZSlla0hXVpDlp+yVA8eUtRh1n5i73yFT3IgxzOun65MaFJwTSOmBvn8 pwOOzK5U3OCFCfhZCcl3SIAa6RoU75VS8MRc/WgZN3LBTx0xpQgFaS9pVs/XNCfGvXTo tTTMXM6an4oQwiY06Mm8XTznygBfkhvqWxDq4H3kM3A4ozl3U+/TyOsIJ0b8c3Zqjfy1 EOIUy7WQL4EvJ/Q/lP/JGYXMKFrKfUxmz+sDwn36/KoaqC4nnt5wLAY4hshY9thXdgDF yzXTLxrchC6aGYwaJ3ZrqLyhLwXaE/MsgAAyPR+B+Jz/l9/m7gMgHctGIfznE1ZGgS1u l7iA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y15si5633392pfc.8.2019.08.30.03.49.07; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727417AbfH3Kss (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 06:48:48 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:34790 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726902AbfH3Kss (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 06:48:48 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3eSU-0004Fs-HR; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:48:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4a8b8815ba3530b6e0ec611c9579658a458cd522.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: Convert 6 GHz channel frequency to channel number From: Johannes Berg To: Arend Van Spriel , Amar Singhal , jouni@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, jjohnson@codeaurora.org, rmanohar@codeaurora.org Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:48:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20190830_124746_755381_51D6A777) References: <1567117290-19295-1-git-send-email-asinghal@codeaurora.org> <420dcc9c0023791b72dba2d776045fc0b025597a.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20190830_124746_755381_51D6A777) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 12:47 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 8/30/2019 12:32 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 15:21 -0700, Amar Singhal wrote: > > > Enhance function ieee80211_frequency_to_channel by adding 6 GHz > > > channels. > > > > Wait, this is already supported, no? Just implemented slightly > > differently? > > It is Johannes, but I was unaware as well. Did you forget to email that > it was applied or is there some automated stuff that failed on you? ;-) Truth be told, I've been very lazy (mostly due to being busy) and haven't responded manually - and also haven't managed to set up anything that would automate a response, I tried Kalle's tool at one point but it didn't work for me yet. Right now, your best bet is probably to poll patchwork, sorry about that. johannes