Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authenticated-By: 
From:   Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
CC:     "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "jano.vesely@gmail.com" <jano.vesely@gmail.com>,
        "linux@endlessm.com" <linux@endlessm.com>,
        "briannorris@chromium.org" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        "gojun077@gmail.com" <gojun077@gmail.com>,
        "drake@endlessm.com" <drake@endlessm.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "jian-hong@endlessm.com" <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement
Thread-Topic: [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement
Thread-Index: AQHVYjf+tJUqi3DD9EqGXCYBRVE/qacZzA1DgAAL0HA=
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:55:56 +0000
Message-ID: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18C5FE8@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
References: <1567502047-24102-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com>
 <871rwxr5xp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <871rwxr5xp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US
Content-Language: zh-TW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kvalo@codeaurora.org]
> 
> <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
> >
> > This patch set includes two patches to improve PCI interrupt routine.
> > One is to reduce HW IRQ time, the other is to enable MSI.
> >
> > The patches can be found at:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11114043/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11126007/
> >
> > They were rebased properly to resolve conflicts.
> 
> In the future, please use version markings ("v2", "v3" etc) in the
> Subject and not something like "rebased". This makes my life easier as I
> can immeaditely see what is the latest version I should take.
> 

Oh, I just combine two patches with different version markings.
And I don't know how to write a proper subject in this case, maybe
I shouldn't use cover latter?

Yan-Hsuan