Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 68C4560213
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "jano.vesely\@gmail.com" <jano.vesely@gmail.com>,
        "linux\@endlessm.com" <linux@endlessm.com>,
        "briannorris\@chromium.org" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        "gojun077\@gmail.com" <gojun077@gmail.com>,
        "drake\@endlessm.com" <drake@endlessm.com>,
        "davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "jian-hong\@endlessm.com" <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rebased 0/2] rtw88: pci: interrupt routine improvement
References: <1567502047-24102-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com>
        <871rwxr5xp.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
        <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18C5FE8@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:17:46 +0300
In-Reply-To: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18C5FE8@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
        (Tony Chuang's message of "Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:55:56 +0000")
Message-ID: <87o901po9h.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:

>> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kvalo@codeaurora.org]
>> 
>> <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
>> 
>> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
>> >
>> > This patch set includes two patches to improve PCI interrupt routine.
>> > One is to reduce HW IRQ time, the other is to enable MSI.
>> >
>> > The patches can be found at:
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11114043/
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11126007/
>> >
>> > They were rebased properly to resolve conflicts.
>> 
>> In the future, please use version markings ("v2", "v3" etc) in the
>> Subject and not something like "rebased". This makes my life easier as I
>> can immeaditely see what is the latest version I should take.
>> 
>
> Oh, I just combine two patches with different version markings.
> And I don't know how to write a proper subject in this case, maybe
> I shouldn't use cover latter?

The cover letter was helpful, please continue using that. IIRC the
separate patches were v3 and v4, so using v5 would have been clear for
me. But no need to resend because of this, just trying to streamline the
process and optimise my time :)

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches