Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4368422ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnl9PEn6UicBfRK8lkHGUN2sE8uLxoizWxoErKwBMoW6s8Zpdbz/AybLb74/Ogkh6qpQ/5 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cc95:: with SMTP id p21mr25569900edt.189.1572354707393; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572354707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tvmD+Z+BfVanyIp7MaYHbXstWI5SA8DeU5T2EjKFmPoR2bvh2oHFUmWkUpBG30fnlF LOt0ARv7ZcdfQ3ZX3Ski4T8HFWAuXXcoXngHtSPII5s3yI0iYvhH14FLETsvVUf5zpW+ 9FiA0bSC8Sr9Ph/UQqGcSyK1QgZLNTgtm8PyHYWXRs31Laqnhe8EpFVaI8TxVbD1yazz lG1poveYXJHNoeaYKgvOE4tL3/RVgl7WD99HIsj/xsqrZW36Kdd9X4yiqA027W39Nhi7 u7dd218/pi+7WdrkJubJaWpjSUY5tfmXBOeSRbD0MZm9Lxkb3V+kGCHNp7jnjg3ib43t +V1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ynxqVtdsqhywDBe6wAHrwjnabrfK53FCpzKt+2e+JE4=; b=eQobI105fwWopeAqEmElOIZtb0asruE8NNjAuWQ63OvM//5w3SPd6FixadVVOInwHs ZmIBvYB+da5HSDHdZGlramx1LBFC5KPUtg9ZP5+H7UV/1LqFBDix3S845ePcahIgr0n/ IT4ultoomKH9W9QKiDjlvRSkf39iEEXtLlnnuAjY6suAzsoAzOst1zh18xaqbU56ercr tchD13SSyf6Kk5n/CNlj8f/RIYhMkuhRigDacDR4T60n/3YvAzGEVQAi12WaDt/aB2WH ln0xYRYd+ju597kSh56qRVopJDPf4xkqWD9j/BM294Nc5L6uYdpDUCFsCRLc6UJ7uuIs 41ig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d30si9275751edj.289.2019.10.29.06.11.20; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732534AbfJ2NI6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:08:58 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:39312 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728735AbfJ2NI6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:08:58 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f197.google.com ([209.85.219.197]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPRF2-0000ZG-6r for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:56 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f197.google.com with SMTP id w69so10492710ybe.18 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:08:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ynxqVtdsqhywDBe6wAHrwjnabrfK53FCpzKt+2e+JE4=; b=auV95qD+7vghphQj3lP1dR3EY4YeGO5JdtW7Ubv//y8HHXFgR+Lv33dzGULQmkr+61 LoVYXjyaM1EzRfH2iBqT0B88VczbFqEn1+hztc9/1yJeUQmGz/Zb9XXCWMmXOaV5mQf8 mfCfc9WhF7GKCJqEXkpQTjr2mLY1sozwK0gJbVgMhyzraVFEtnG8Uls6p6uclIxchEqj prO2KT2bw3PqCc3a2VD2KxEFzzWl3cX0f+29a4V4qgHga2WDK18GDP6AKW1ZAA9UYreO 9qQ3tH7Q9bpvjmHG4OCoAmLzFd0RaiHyChU2VBbkpxDSx4XIRI8zyEc7R4Z4st0ye90j wUig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLJvbExH9Io9Ge+3D27iGRZ8sg+xwfGfW/qRCl+1zjOz7axGnQ Q5Dl+FfIrDqm7K03Abpe+yOgEBnPvVYYlkBX92QCmb1NiVB7LRZivGocSlQ8yReLIF8bD57lKri vvYx7y89myPghcASWZG82jibg9ayUEGoxaL2AJgltUdFW X-Received: by 2002:a81:ab42:: with SMTP id d2mr16395655ywk.370.1572354535253; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a81:ab42:: with SMTP id d2mr16395627ywk.370.1572354534920; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2605:a601:ac3:9720:f461:b9b9:429:65bd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k67sm635653ywa.71.2019.10.29.06.08.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:08:53 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Emil Petersky Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Create entry for united European region Message-ID: <20191029130853.GN30813@ubuntu-xps13> References: <20190907235636.GA8256@ubuntu-xps13> <39933518-6a65-fab3-4a66-8f44fc319d57@streamunlimited.com> <76f464e9-8806-ecbf-2dc8-67bb4190ecc7@streamunlimited.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <76f464e9-8806-ecbf-2dc8-67bb4190ecc7@streamunlimited.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:55:07AM +0200, Emil Petersky wrote: > Create entry for united European region, as usage of frequency bands > is harmonized over EU and almost all CEPT countries as well. > > All EU countries and almost all CEPT countries accepted decisions > 2005/513/EC (5GHz RLAN, EN 301 893) > and 2006/771/EC (amended by 2008/432/EC, Short-Range Devices, EN 300 440) >  EU decision 2005/513/EC: > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02005D0513-20070213 >  EU decision 2006/771/EC: > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02008D0432-20080611 > Harmonized CEPT countries: > https://www.ecodocdb.dk/download/25c41779-cd6e/Rec7003e.pdf > Such decision make sense to create united European region (EU) in regdb > > United region for EU in regdb will enable much easier handling of proper > wlan parameters on embedded devices sold across the Europe. I'm a little curious about this one. I do agree that it would simplify things, but is an EU contry code something standard that wireless APs generally will advertise, or that clients will understand? And we do still have all the individual countries to maintain. Maybe it would make sense to define an EU region as rules that countries could inherit, and then have rules for any deviations from the common EU rules. Thoughts? Thanks, Seth