Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2090563ybc; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:51:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAZo2RaAEmQOdsBolbs3ajSkq8703VNsopkdBtwnTZzmjEXs71kowFnj5HXXt060cp4rMg X-Received: by 2002:a50:b685:: with SMTP id d5mr4729918ede.276.1573663902857; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:51:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573663902; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qP/NRijLovAanLNPhNEqo8v4u5S6sblDr+0s7zxwe1pfxrDJYmlK5+YSw3J2H/Yyg1 CWHTCO1gtC09f9+U3yTV6tfts7TDOQnAgedaymVyX8uoBrKdRN9MwBgp2PGfp76KsiEb kv60FX4UyZAlFyrhlAIBfVmBuZZxy5nusagxVZP6my0rLcoHaE9zkjVMnLhe0OriplHs 2bBlqWJR1VePARlz0H7LpCCme3Gu1niLzwkETHKSd+lxFsOCYd75nIso+oIAGGO43hfR +ko+/3wkECEt2ADui31RkdZ7GsdZNZUG8QXf+Ipv4rHdH0triiSbPOa6riljzV/y4/ki HCsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=TBVtymOI9WwZsWEvU07x8pNEkzVPUQwttMv3w1HkiJ8=; b=j8PLmTZNNyQXafxtfC59CZJy08rf0trQlASvNxvqbuRuayEEg6RM8AsYG9rNQfAS5q dB3QSmyb802VjSNEguZFrzvOVp8mMoZB3zRninC6idukuskxfFm/hUAan32wSKN13zNN FojUbIRfUMVtpQkVSNV9Wi/VBgF7ilYv4Y9YyeWCAKMqevwdjQlizLp0969yjnbrRaqJ 12FIL/nEHSlRUh902sMioFI3pxVVuDGA7TCDkNrM4o7gT5r1qNrlubT3QGokyl9esg97 ROAKEcSGp0s2/FCaEg8d25stzr4dkc6oHd5EuvsSRmknnfN6elBaFfl94BniqFWN74lR Ztow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mvo2vdSi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qh13si1496261ejb.407.2019.11.13.08.51.07; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mvo2vdSi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727941AbfKMPqv (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:46:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:40544 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727745AbfKMPqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:46:51 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r4so1918835pfl.7; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=TBVtymOI9WwZsWEvU07x8pNEkzVPUQwttMv3w1HkiJ8=; b=mvo2vdSi3TpgqVnEPaWhYlSWv2KwG7IyopXGZJg3fMsbp3v6j1pIvTAVW8UfVQkH9K XdEFqj8ztEc9jrMWhZI0oyM3fLG+vzPaurnl13NBHlkvwMQQDhKJ6tjoxWfmuVy3EnkF WoqlsNflDPGF0RgSgSo+t5DT/6kTQvRdi+rzdAh/wqLE6FZw2HyT08WjnZD03GNGakdY rCCVMbfDRWP3TaNAPYx8WgMgXBxyrbVUACB9X7fOfbiVcpTu4DTMkV9WBeSyi6DAx7dY YzujGpVbXJ+ZM7bDbrBcRP2H5GvkH/9WTqLtPyQuonXAb2cs/0VgfHG1ZROKJeg9Ea2Y imUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=TBVtymOI9WwZsWEvU07x8pNEkzVPUQwttMv3w1HkiJ8=; b=cJWfVSNCMkEefci9wmM/TGe3+gPIhXQ7hgUQwP5CfJ9w4nZEW5LCjxbkjEotZRlU0J 8nlzuvQ6wr2YdopsTQ853Fo1i91DISKroVjLfk5SucRP5jsiyr/iLZPwvFHRWpRFmWT+ 418LV1N6Ri9F4tWTPFbeDCSu5ntmM+5fd3N02DavPKKPFNDYdEm14O9UPIQ0dtpCmI1n g9X3sxbBrcrZQgk7yb32gfDPqZbC35IytqCOMCPTAkVnDBFn40GaSdn1JJXZ5nEjkWcp AzPaG2h1fdlB9ZIBV2MkUpHsJn1rJEevIlWwU7tEu723lsF2Lpf5ZVPKWB/NkK52g/5p I7rg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUZFfScK6acZq7D1LT2q1beUn2i3ITnbSLdOVSdzU9h91WofcY dnbDo70EeRWpfsYqBRhP3lQ= X-Received: by 2002:a63:e84d:: with SMTP id a13mr4422751pgk.226.1573660010409; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from aw-bldr-10.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com. [199.106.103.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm3953091pfc.21.2019.11.13.07.46.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:49 -0800 (PST) From: Jeffrey Hugo To: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo Subject: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Handle "invalid" BDFs for msm8998 devices Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:46 -0800 Message-Id: <20191113154646.43048-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org When the BDF download QMI message has the end field set to 1, it signals the end of the transfer, and triggers the firmware to do a CRC check. The BDFs for msm8998 devices fail this check, yet the firmware is happy to still use the BDF. It appears that this error is not caught by the downstream drive by concidence, therefore there are production devices in the field where this issue needs to be handled otherwise we cannot support wifi on them. So, attempt to detect this scenario as best we can and treat it as non-fatal. Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson --- v2: -tweak conditional nesting -add comment in code to clarify drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c index 637f83ef65f8..6df2d3ac5474 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c @@ -279,7 +279,15 @@ static int ath10k_qmi_bdf_dnld_send_sync(struct ath10k_qmi *qmi) if (ret < 0) goto out; - if (resp.resp.result != QMI_RESULT_SUCCESS_V01) { + /* end = 1 triggers a CRC check on the BDF. If this fails, we + * get a QMI_ERR_MALFORMED_MSG_V01 error, but the FW is still + * willing to use the BDF. For some platforms, all the valid + * released BDFs fail this CRC check, so attempt to detect this + * scenario and treat it as non-fatal. + */ + if (resp.resp.result != QMI_RESULT_SUCCESS_V01 && + !(req->end == 1 && + resp.resp.result == QMI_ERR_MALFORMED_MSG_V01)) { ath10k_err(ar, "failed to download board data file: %d\n", resp.resp.error); ret = -EINVAL; -- 2.17.1