Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp7536925ybc; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy3NVxSN8QEZKWoXhgsdfFzxEIAL5/PqQ1Wr/tWttZ9a3sQBLsPurfFVuIwuKk01F/HVeIG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:941:: with SMTP id j1mr3392269ejd.185.1574998645180; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574998645; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0C7q0c8SLFUFUfmpq0s/Sq5m7gGG1VAvLsSGAP5zbK0H+GzYZp+VvuvoYBkS0kZiW9 JqZpF2AmFhthchdSYAFMqEhEck9i5HTLULBDdLocicHl0QTuqmlW9YLPGdFV3QXti4YQ YxHw2k3mHrGZU+bctcH6xgdx+Wk8/iRTLmsczjc/Sj+PcJLLX1J1N6zRpzNhsfBYB4eU zKv/UIEADtnODsDU5lN2GvKu1CkSzTbldVQ0HRCU4caGejT8TbDHV5+kN0yQkihuqHbz KpW3gubl0HDvOqoZq7CL7/2M+jfCQDWb4V7teqe7u/DtTKyH05gX5O2Uv9jX4//Bv0nE uJHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=adXcxNA7Td+R/yELM43Y8VQUIIxQWn12s4q7DlInxeM=; b=XeGEFnDqS3aog8U6JbTkT/AoVA6Xl/TSZFshvYKCuNxxON6huD19C3llsTY6uYFzoM 2coIsl9WIq9n7kRQipPdAPYasBF9oqhh8hg1t7w6nJoRxtraUp/rsBWLhjsEXjKYmPVh XLnN+0XNYa725X89wx/8y7oAuySt0rIFXuVzFCNv0UBTpKZaJII/JEMygtBWoDUrVp5l lSiCiyqm44vCHNUVNm0OQXjNytMgknMSQhcTqTjMFodTEOa9qrHaL3w5QwFzL1BnIVsw aQ4deuQXitYuuF2Y36T84t2PPz18vw2Kp4zbzbizRnL4OZxZFhLDCjEd51157tDUt8U8 WUZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Thl1P+NZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si14118258edz.341.2019.11.28.19.36.46; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Thl1P+NZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726835AbfK2Ddm (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 22:33:42 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:36948 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726764AbfK2Ddm (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 22:33:42 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id e187so24417541qkf.4 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:33:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=adXcxNA7Td+R/yELM43Y8VQUIIxQWn12s4q7DlInxeM=; b=Thl1P+NZ9XgjE8B4U58VUKEXT0CTd7cETlskO0AWwwdcKS/8vvg9y1cMHBRJI1fpbS Py0NwOzPdn6u4MbGfyw2LnoLJEj+SartxzmURmhKIS/FbmVqT+b9oVQuDU2W0Cp1ZwEX qpMwvzun1VauF15Ou16krDNGtfKWCi/MWMiiwiEdGijUrqeLgRCfNwt4PAnQCSsk/986 DqB13my8FGc9xFyNJrAHtEVa6wlC4hX+uTWee+A+J4AQgwdFD6OFHjTLIdFhfUWmuGeD Tmge8La9ksvSN4qT0xKGfOWpakEbQT++U1NPjUFX9sSA2HAvNAHpbfXzLCIMybUqH9Rb dXTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=adXcxNA7Td+R/yELM43Y8VQUIIxQWn12s4q7DlInxeM=; b=kds12M/GKQ3cgLG7ONLnsIIZ6U3L4gcTLrEttcpdwq2ZtjBryYNZlSUy3RU0hOq6s/ h2oTMjp98HS3DYcBEdb/6LasxGMnQhgWMzd6jiU99t8OcNjYcllmP+jrpA+DZuSF8LxR hxN54Pl/T/mXchDb1AVI73afuk4pOuDB6rp5rC9ziUXUvgw9HJAyQMD/cWp+rMagAkX3 ByNqDrlITT/K/mn/m9082UFAc7Ewsgtqyp/Acpd050/MzErIWuLD4VnWXz465+ActRu6 KXWnoKrgHkFKhkB5AYHEK/Dn6pWOlT7VMOFegGgnS6udtXiqQEs1KHkcwHXqJUpmnhVf mTqg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWlX5lmPE+aJpabun/PxJvNnmifMhOZMYeg/JSbPtW3zn4zDbCM h5nVpBMxGncvPnGJ+nLxSoWh2P+Z0XiE3DnxFfcSbA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:5256:: with SMTP id g83mr12597197qkb.366.1574998420488; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:33:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191128121907.6178-1-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20191128121907.6178-3-yhchuang@realtek.com> In-Reply-To: <20191128121907.6178-3-yhchuang@realtek.com> From: Chris Chiu Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 11:33:29 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtw88: pci: reset dma when reset pci trx ring To: Tony Chuang Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless , Brian Norris Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:19 PM wrote: > > From: Chin-Yen Lee > > When pci trx ring is reset, hw dma setting should be reset together. > Otherswise, the rx_tag of rx flow is not synchronous to hw. > > Signed-off-by: Chin-Yen Lee > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > --- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c > index 068f1bec88e6..78971cefb948 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c > @@ -486,13 +486,6 @@ static void rtw_pci_disable_interrupt(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > rtwpci->irq_enabled = false; > } > > -static int rtw_pci_setup(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev) > -{ > - rtw_pci_reset_trx_ring(rtwdev); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static void rtw_pci_dma_reset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_pci *rtwpci) > { > /* reset dma and rx tag */ > @@ -501,6 +494,16 @@ static void rtw_pci_dma_reset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_pci *rtwpci) > rtwpci->rx_tag = 0; > } > > +static int rtw_pci_setup(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev) > +{ > + struct rtw_pci *rtwpci = (struct rtw_pci *)rtwdev->priv; > + > + rtw_pci_reset_trx_ring(rtwdev); > + rtw_pci_dma_reset(rtwdev, rtwpci); > + > + return 0; > +} > + Just a little curious about that the rtw_pci_dma_reset() is already in rtw_pci_start(), then is it really necessary to do it in _setup? Or maybe the rtw_pci_dma_reset() in rtw_pci_start should be removed? Chris > static void rtw_pci_dma_release(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_pci *rtwpci) > { > struct rtw_pci_tx_ring *tx_ring; > -- > 2.17.1 >