Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp163126ybl; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhv7ZFSuFWvUexqOHwlQGwXM7lP9e1dCvI8uSfhRJ4zVIXp+8aWKJEUiyWxAiCWpeB/O5R X-Received: by 2002:a9d:730e:: with SMTP id e14mr1524385otk.62.1575446938195; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575446938; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bgWCHxzCnRGMncOmWy4cvj7BtXpxkTffB7CeiyswavGh2jUbGwhBPJIRhc1kxw3Ghi Lv0EvrSLkLsNdYZOBW1ZHlEtKZkz9XfVN08ns+UKXBzcht27wZOOkHMRYWOu7ewZXHGq QWvN8es2b3gaUNlt54QFkJyNNYy80ElaWF7xJpC5eWGpzBh4+TWud36svNnQnrJq9yHc sWcw7pMsDhZQIcbKo24GJg+dxQpO0Sc5hhva6dv0KJkdAtJ3J6eQIKhUhW0wQq9P75Zo fb+p1Mai3Hqd1q12ajvJ/CLi8d8Q2MmGPb8fA9NIFcXxcMAGuRMhsRNhqnVsfOxMJ2MO wVgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=iMf3APXM7C7XepyOJ7XnGDlyP2hwa2M6NAcZ1juHuCY=; b=h54NjzBz3mIHKGDKkfoB2XlSA0BREnTpPEQqlTZWRLjF1BnPelBB3QxJUp4MvAwx6W DzZVqP4dmwDRvz+UU8VCzRSTVmv7x1BZXEe7z/8984hEuQ1pURtMiL31dYnENn16PTke MlJIydqQ1jZSvql8aRk2qZsWUGtKv8xjLs/nDwNMIqm9vL9Ywy2YkKTpqbJjPL99CpUl 21xP0qDzOVoQ5QbhlkCZGLInxp8UgCafQbmFe8+EO9wLjN9eoYhDAukTHXrBizTV8xBF W6fm6I03Pn3K7WuyE+CsvylBRj/lx5jcf8i4cKYP2PjxjZ6ht0xh6akFcj797YsK7xpR j97Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d13si2746151otp.196.2019.12.04.00.08.40; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727212AbfLDIIH (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 03:08:07 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:44550 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725951AbfLDIIG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 03:08:06 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1icPhY-00HZvi-VX; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH v8 0/2] Implement Airtime-based Queue Limit (AQL) From: Johannes Berg To: Kalle Valo , Kan Yan Cc: Dave Taht , Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= , Rajkumar Manoharan , Kevin Hayes , Make-Wifi-fast , linux-wireless , Yibo Zhao , John Crispin , Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:07:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0101016ecf3bc899-6e391bba-96ed-4495-a7be-1aa8dd8f1bf2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <20191115014846.126007-1-kyan@google.com> <8736eiam8f.fsf@toke.dk> <87a78p8rz7.fsf@toke.dk> <87muco5gv5.fsf@toke.dk> <87eexvyoy8.fsf@toke.dk> <878so2m5gp.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <0101016ecf3bc899-6e391bba-96ed-4495-a7be-1aa8dd8f1bf2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 04:47 +0000, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > Overall, I think AQL and fq_codel works well, at least with ath10k. > > The current target value of 20 ms is a reasonable default. It is > > relatively conservative that helps stations with weak signal to > > maintain stable throughput. Although, a debugfs entry that allows > > runtime adjustment of target value could be useful. > > Why not make it configurable via nl80211? We should use debugfs only for > testing and debugging, not in production builds, and to me the use case > for this value sounds like more than just testing. On the other hand, what application/tool or even user would be able to set this correctly? johannes