Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp437079ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 02:11:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEVwjrLGuTYY9ib5azBkLiGE4fygG8gtXgbKINdpmVgp68WMTcOp1sS4qDvckE19Juh0Dv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:210:: with SMTP id l16mr2159953oie.95.1576059099069; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 02:11:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576059099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ayl7tV4bHoUGiGKXUa21uwj3rWPBm7CJaScuja/9JeykgdXM1NKxJZ1edE3HOOPd3U K2hTmQvloAtW5vzYqbAxhCPU1xXS5OfagnFxKrGybL9t3OuijSLMqgM3UAy0PLJDjX9z VcehX+vqUSi+ddoRUGKXjUsQdJFBCAZ8ck+6jVxxpqcATcHJzN+ErwIm5zNJFGq+zyhd LWjqL5ts+1oQ2ft3bMRVNFkw111NdypFYLvdpEzsGMpkGOjl7LwKfR7lTRjxQAcMCK+D 2QaJUwZOhfnqfV6jo/AjUaUQCyUq/VqucVtmlMKjQ87aiQDrfjiuu2oPheBquCykGO86 HwCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=KA3IAP8AVn/y5yu4gOyBFl5XZlpOeGqaQZUenoIpnAQ=; b=fCS/MwWFVconKUoGoU0SL2avSjK594rJtPw/Mb8OKoTy6OoSdMsOlV0t3q4TGs2QZ1 V8E6rHoX5Tfutfk4/vqKWxpZ8J7W8m3NR4KT4+6YG0wj+KKfavLjzkcDryZ4Rcy+Ox1j Use0utuhrYV5ClI0Q7WZqXXf7wnZZ3aAANp3XDtdRCfY+A2OW0tUOs9CV5nmRZ5/s5Ln t8IgK1CAF+gnU+0fXr2tHkx44QnuLZuZXavlc5psZgC1BidXNtA2kY5d0qonjPeCVJRB yALEplFl23ICATLkfAgple2qv1PPeYXJcSeKDEPWiF4iQdmhXD0/g8w4Lg5gN+est8ns ACRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c6si753646oto.283.2019.12.11.02.11.19; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 02:11:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728441AbfLKKLM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:11:12 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:48630 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727829AbfLKKLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:11:12 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ieyxW-003hWD-Tn; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:11:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3420d73e667b01ec64bf0cc9da6232b41e862860.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: iwlwifi warnings in 5.5-rc1 From: Johannes Berg To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= , Jens Axboe , Emmanuel Grumbach , Luca Coelho Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Networking Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:11:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878snjgs5l.fsf@toke.dk> References: <9727368004ceef03f72d259b0779c2cf401432e1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <878snjgs5l.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 09:53 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Johannes Berg writes: > > > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 13:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since the GRO issue got fixed, iwlwifi has worked fine for me. > > > However, on every boot, I get some warnings: > > > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > STA b4:75:0e:99:1f:e0 AC 2 txq pending airtime underflow: 4294967088, 208 > > > > Yeah, we've seen a few reports of this. > > FWIW I've tried reproducing but I don't get the error with the 8265 / > 8275 chip in my laptop. I've thought about sending a patch for mac80211 > to just clear the tx_time_est field after calling > ieee80211_sta_update_pending_airtime() - that should prevent any errors > from double-reporting of skbs (which is what I'm guessing is going on > here). It does feel like it, but I'm not sure how that'd be possible? OK, I talked with Emmanuel and I think it's the GSO path - it'll end up with skb_clone() and then report both of them back. Regardless, I think I'll probably have to disable AQL and make it more opt-in for the driver - I found a bunch of other issues ... johannes