Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp745489ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:56:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpMlHw7MIxe01gI4qnoZFnqzG5ymd45Ew3QShKTwvQitmLsdZg5IOWD06M2/WHaHNsnvMj X-Received: by 2002:aca:4b4a:: with SMTP id y71mr2911529oia.90.1576076170562; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:56:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576076170; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qhhJFOWcEM7Xr8/a/wT4uFRGoZlfrXjKefYPRv0H1fSFjzmiWjWEELNxhi5Z3DxU4E J4rBpqN9mIwYIFQSJRKbB/FUbuISCwa54oRIAIzO6QSDNWKows0fa/EeGgIo//CTszVJ fE4x2oxJpIpfa+/Rt9vNmuwToeXAwSZ76VfekSgjTn/s9BjS1bBsMeXdZsja4AbTEaYY 8y4AmTD6titkn/56z/GrQM2DrA3me+bLj8fem2jbGHvGm0eZBTxpFMatTArftOPgB40D lAZkcLsRCRN9NYFw8YjTebfCnJwrTi2lBGiPKqYhFzKd/GD43RkmLjHqbPWALRoUvQgL 3P0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=/xRV6BaNRtqgbV4uBsZ9UxoINqOvZn7cXzR7XnrwTAM=; b=mNL1qKEYqGvFHGJvgZNfBKYivf96Ln44DOcRlL8DkC3Tg0ba+JXFprKU9yEDRWc5bf s5AFOBkP7Q1mLUg0Lv4LT5yZ2Kh3o6Rho97zCNVCuPQ/b1HiIuxIZFcFqGNxP3tcs99S Pr0XOimUn0OLirawO6PpqdyBIrdUY2/Ci1/Fzep1efKAl3hAD+uDG9A0KGf1688qjzfJ zO6IWuacuAZ/S0wlawx5dGRz1WoeFpScQ3zx3GhpKWnWYF74PC097QCBQU6m7hlNXG0Y QEpA4gxmIjMdn3XkvxFFPh7LBh4qnq6CVNJTucyuNaMcafoAEBw3LQXX2MFFgBCSnsC8 gTuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QWOaYmZc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6si1320060oie.215.2019.12.11.06.55.59; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:56:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QWOaYmZc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729435AbfLKOzY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:55:24 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:50450 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729701AbfLKOzX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:55:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576076122; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/xRV6BaNRtqgbV4uBsZ9UxoINqOvZn7cXzR7XnrwTAM=; b=QWOaYmZcE0hurDxqADHs42hamU0SC8MUmNIda6sh6gXRAHz0e7cAILzTL19dsDAXpXmjEB iZtLSlz9R6cHJYbiAgXFZQ4Ud9/4NdXq7IBYWjFMcnsZdV5da3soJFysT2/uZHcWfWSMzB Wgdg0ZgP1IXeGPMylG2OEKbuMjSRz30= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-48-Nvkse2TwOxye6sfMxuobtw-1; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:55:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id b12so4465251ljo.11 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:55:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ucwElWdgkQaEklwem1iDH2kvuF3LSBSdbIgBouf/AM=; b=VrGqP3uShRR3vVdaRygPiUNlnOyRjEGtPiKGXCwDvtMNsRZw0RMqbm9hJVcyY9TzQz ixhK2ln4k0cC7+xMwOVDsV1WsxBTIZpYh30q9gporm8xJIxfdgEdPP5OUxkDzwoBMR/0 A3zviwRSmI63Ugl+l1s++kceXCnG+7q4Dbtj51RtGf7m6CqKSqB9Le2C3l7g6evc5Eci IRvgqJSblq8yONBIGY2V+rD06XtAVif5/ch5LAtOWCDuqj2hHyil1H9zcUAfeBZFU1km Hs6t3GsPvWHds6HEOwUHztL790SLmAI/jpFpIcMczwNMadrNery+tufSfEgXM6rqeVEQ CNjw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsLPVXd7IOTzDfguEv7EJHTDRBQpBso+zC8lVYOLf1tzDJlVs5 BNJ+Tkzil9NMk1opitAQ8lZ/LGUoGXBDO4gbgDBLijUeSsnjBHvWLstSitnVoo8tCpqYFm4WqAo nhkmgNanj2zeaQJqZFxH9+Svon+Y= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f52:: with SMTP id v18mr2122640ljk.30.1576076115911; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:55:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f52:: with SMTP id v18mr2122628ljk.30.1576076115767; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([45.145.92.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e12sm1324145ljj.17.2019.12.11.06.55.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 896F318033F; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:55:14 +0100 (CET) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Johannes Berg , Jens Axboe , Emmanuel Grumbach , Luca Coelho , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Steve French Cc: "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , Networking Subject: Re: iwlwifi warnings in 5.5-rc1 In-Reply-To: References: <87o8wfeyx5.fsf@toke.dk> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:55:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0cugbe5.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: Nvkse2TwOxye6sfMxuobtw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Johannes Berg writes: > On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 15:09 +0100, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote= : >>=20 >> If we're doing this on a per-driver basis, let's make it a proper >> NL80211_EXT_FEATURE and expose it to userspace; that way users can at >> least discover if it's supported on their device. I can send a patch >> adding that... > > Sure. Just didn't get to that yet, but if you want to send a patch > that's very welcome. I have to run out now, will be back in the evening > at most. Patch here (for those not following linux-wireless): https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=3D215107 >> Maybe we should untangle this from airtime_flags completely, since if we >> just use the flags people could conceivably end up disabling it by >> mistake, couldn't they? > > Yes, that sounds like a good plan, now I was wondering why it's there > anyway. Convenience, I think :) -Toke