Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 6 Jan 2020 20:19:19 +0100
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc:     Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        hdegoede@redhat.com, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
        hante.meuleman@broadcom.com, chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com,
        wright.feng@cypress.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: sdio: Fix OOB interrupt initialization on
 brcm43362
Message-ID: <20200106191919.GA826263@myrica>
References: <20191226092033.12600-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
 <16f419a7070.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
 <141f055a-cd1d-66cb-7052-007cda629d3a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <141f055a-cd1d-66cb-7052-007cda629d3a@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 05:37:58PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> I haven't seen any driver probe failures due to OOB on NVIDIA Tegra,
> only suspend-resume was problematic due to the unbalanced OOB
> interrupt-wake enabling.
> 
> But maybe checking whether OOB interrupt-wake works by invoking
> enable_irq_wake() during brcmf_sdiod_intr_register() causes trouble for
> the cubietruck board.
> 
> @Jean-Philippe, could you please try this change (on top of recent
> linux-next):

Sorry for the delay, linux-next doesn't boot for me at the moment and I
have little time to investigate why, so I might retry closer to the merge
window.

However, isn't the interrupt-wake issue independent from the problem
(introduced in v4.17) that my patch fixes? I applied "brcmfmac: Keep OOB
wake-interrupt disabled when it shouldn't be enabled" on v5.5-rc5 and it
doesn't seem to cause a regression, but the wifi only works if I apply my
patch as well.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index b684a5b6d904..80d7106b10a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -115,13 +115,6 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_intr_register(struct brcmf_sdio_dev
> *sdiodev)
>                 }
>                 sdiodev->oob_irq_requested = true;
> 
> -               ret = enable_irq_wake(pdata->oob_irq_nr);
> -               if (ret != 0) {
> -                       brcmf_err("enable_irq_wake failed %d\n", ret);
> -                       return ret;
> -               }
> -               disable_irq_wake(pdata->oob_irq_nr);
> -
>                 sdio_claim_host(sdiodev->func1);
> 
>                 if (sdiodev->bus_if->chip == BRCM_CC_43362_CHIP_ID) {