Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp7470529ybl; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:42:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuIBc+KApd/ZYerYLoN74cbydrWKCipTJbgt177W/nnGMBiR1Frv88J+HEx1lTExLNJtH6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1294:: with SMTP id z20mr1011488otp.60.1579160572558; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:42:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579160572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PxcneI2CqpfVsD39BBSSVdS1eAsfHoCwlT5BXNMQAI5h0l0yb+81u0JzD9Pef0X25P 6BgD3V5Fapv9QXageE0DEN4hjtRPxKByaHYaUCpYYTJI8sLTVD6dAsia0sK/GxNj1MYt rQ/+FwDS+77hk4RrHWlC/Ct4lg7Z876XQwLEgMF2G5HrKkEz+9f0CuKG4qgowACJpRNX eeXj1MxdzwbouOuU40JeOpkb7/KPXuFDa8dBDnSbS/HX1akPsQtwwFfw3PKPNqJVV6nJ AeV49QlMohnleMXsjQNbCFBusSO1/cZWSA6pXPeHa/5Y50ilxHvywV9m/DiChH76lIyi cpmA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=Wn4PXrxvbuGlnTtHdH6rD+MjFbWg4aeWMW1peJF8Fm0=; b=lCJPS7k5wG84GnffSgzr1xKBhuMaFHpUaPoxZ9AMPWzsG+ckegqXOqx8CAg0KDzGaT j1Ksew4TuzLo1s5fp/hKR3h/bke2E/fz3zP69q4SlKLCpFr65Gf//XJvzUDyLYokrRym 23VmH5aTih5nLDC7LsO+M39PEJF4QBVTPV1X/MIqfmahyokGNoOVL4BTo0q6oMVV8ary u0WBqhn94YdwURFmg301MUEoUIXUW74xuP0Fkm1opZWQcFXsdbUciqSG38zmgXEHSo1e N+v6E9716Odn1w3Myk1fcgpquYik1UD5JCeGJ1aPGvoli0ad9qHhzAkp9RsuYu264JqY AfAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z12si13925152otm.189.2020.01.15.23.42.29; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726726AbgAPHmA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:42:00 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:47944 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726315AbgAPHl7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:41:59 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1irzmv-00BTj7-Ff; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:41:57 +0100 Message-ID: <11f9a3969270b7f0cb60e1b91ac31aea3bc94a93.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix a STA PS bug and add PS support to mac80211_hwsim From: Johannes Berg To: Thomas Pedersen Cc: linux-wireless Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:41:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <385589b2-e8a2-1e39-d347-f3353bc681aa@adapt-ip.com> References: <20191119053538.25979-1-thomas@adapt-ip.com> <85ed0881d0aeecd886b27bd482fa61fa86d96729.camel@sipsolutions.net> <43f4d446d7f8b9a08e091ab811fbf99bf00da2af.camel@sipsolutions.net> <8ebb225f-8ec5-0897-03cd-f37bfdd94429@adapt-ip.com> <34040c2da85b14ff7881460efd2348b7d84b4b21.camel@sipsolutions.net> <385589b2-e8a2-1e39-d347-f3353bc681aa@adapt-ip.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 21:23 -0800, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > On 1/14/20 12:00 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > Is there a list of known passing hwsim tests somewhere? > > > > > > Maybe a subset of suites / tests you like to see passing as a smoke test? > > > > Not really. > > > > > Or do you run through the 3300+ tests and expect them all to pass? > > > > Pretty much, yes. It takes <10 minutes on my quad-core desktop to run > > using the UML time-travel mode against recent kernels. > > > > I don't always get 100% pass on the first round, but the handful that > > fails sometimes I expect to pass when running just those manually with > > vm-run.sh. > > Thanks, I'll give UML time-travel mode a try. FWIW, I applied your patches yesterday. There was one issue remaining uncovered by them, but it wasn't actually related to your patches, just related to the test sending too many frames. I sent a workaround to the hostap list and also the "mac80211: use more bits for ack_frame_id" to the kernel to fix that. johannes