Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp863079ybl; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:58:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrW6htbSnYCwINzmBLvKS/wZdJGR+WZBpUXTSVqaeZwaNUghBiv/a5nTxemkrCkpKsRmWC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:15d7:: with SMTP id j23mr481991otr.357.1580324327090; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:58:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580324327; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EcmuKKaBmx5ElllkKLt89LWdGJmI5OStTdL3oWHBnLV37W6WYbY3XMQFe+JmybL5R3 AnURvP0KYedes5wQwJPqvitc0vKK3/p2QYHj0XYdt2cFu2QLfoZ55kRVTpEjsFbhCFYD Esj0ks9T5xd+SK3eUXeLv2rmf8OiRu5rU7eArlWARODDrAXZ18gYScN30AEDDMS9bWi8 /XD2wVpSvobteGOo51y+k1RcTYqXhGVub06vdYFrygk8smB/9iQJpVE4T+bx42ww8amv wN+rEBf1JwZx65EPqcJcWu/DqPmCRbhkPujy7VKplBFLZFufwujDSxXiUMkGrpO6pJ91 bVUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:to:subject:dkim-signature :dkim-filter; bh=24AkT/pMl908V4cz3jLkCcV3DizYxtorZdkOtXA5hIU=; b=G/Le7SAagC2oDUhDyXwujERx9tr/yaCSDHy6lnWgnnATDvcyYmGUHCtlKr+cNckvCk yd9uTtNOOyrah1EPZJ4iZTlM2JBq7mef0EBwk3N29UECzyWeUz6PuB5laoRytW908uom X856HL6xXkZCMoi/rLhko9HtznT0gxPjjqTswqNPiNyVlgk+Q20bXcU/7BWokIZgRgPx 2vWPgM8jsdryYVDsfSfFzUiX2BQ8QaJLyzvKycqLgeD0PPNvzN8VoBCV9jAzvLeYqLQY KVRFEe/eU4nS73u+h5/1JADoGhxu8Nvg6+kIP93627PCt2KRDd1X5uSATi0OF5Knu8Ik NT2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@candelatech.com header.s=default header.b=U2DOhJ37; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=candelatech.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h7si1421716otm.165.2020.01.29.10.58.23; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:58:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@candelatech.com header.s=default header.b=U2DOhJ37; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=candelatech.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727529AbgA2SmI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:42:08 -0500 Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:52174 "EHLO mail3.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727522AbgA2SmI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:42:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (50-251-239-81-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74F03137586; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:42:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail3.candelatech.com 74F03137586 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=candelatech.com; s=default; t=1580323327; bh=QsUirO+HnCbE2ORNTWB+j3sWg0WNbWy59Q80E3HxW5A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=U2DOhJ37B4J2UK7DEC4s2B9pHvgXbhwq2z1TGHf3ki37Rgjm4qhIz3n/YnldewzMP rlExHxDlj4FAS8UUz2qEpz+JOysvT955JJkB8YHS1I394F39CQWYpG9pLv+wN1GVe3 +yFQJgAa8jrgh7Hp6egJfvuHk8D+++3QDEvW8qFA= Subject: Re: Strange performance issue when using two devices at once To: Marlon Smith , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1580323191.26012.48.camel@gmail.com> From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies Message-ID: <2e80a485-892d-3b29-19c7-38a9caa14f4b@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:42:07 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1580323191.26012.48.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 1/29/20 10:39 AM, Marlon Smith wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have two RT5370 devices connected to the same access point. Both > devices are very slow, but the instant I disconnect one device, the > other speeds up by a factor of 10. Out of curiosity, are both of the RT5370 used on the same client device? Did you check that they have unique MAC addresses? Thanks, Ben > > The really strange part is that one device will perform slowly even if > the other device is basically idle! I've confirmed this with a packet > sniffer. > > I've been trying to do some debugging, and I've found that when both > devices are connected to the access point, they report a large number > of duplicate frames. I added some debug output > inĀ ieee80211_rx_h_check_dup() to confirm that this only happens while > both devices are connected. The packet sniffer also shows a large > number of retries while this is occurring. > > Using backports 5.3-rc4 for this, but also tested on 4.14-rc2. > > I did post about this previously on this mailing list (RT5370 > performance issues), but I thought I'd post again with this new > information and more descriptive title. I'm a little bit stuck on this > for a while now, so any ideas are much appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Marlon > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com