Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1870297ybl; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwk7sJZFCwRBld91Qx6n+8WYX88dO5t5VHxAQBmRW8oGEROST1oDvCRgfPsZCon6SQshcY X-Received: by 2002:a54:480c:: with SMTP id j12mr3174406oij.130.1580398059695; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580398059; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yCcxI0t53ckf0JXQGHZPnwlX7vQmZ5FaXotbUisCDV9vJK1YU2MaNQOax+tJfQo271 kSQBCIDTJ2V/YLgyGeIjc1tyVVHwpwSNqgFGJPdzDnWvv8PdnV4ZVA3fmi1/D4GLNI6X SByDg+rKrKPfvaJXgLVZ3L5HOQajZ+NH35raHIa8dQ4jbNVgbwufh/YlxJIaXqq9IpBN JB11/ocii5Gi7cT7s0QXX6pvmsvbsKKkMmW2VRuBE3gMRxkNY289DHkFruhwZnrQIMWa cN+sRFYLmlJV1Mn6czXAD0MUje4omv/B2V4NZsgSud8F8kzbOoYvE2RARtamPJ0CGXkA ab3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=RIl5isGRyg0OUfNiiDJ603XTuJh1TpO2ohuCwJnOvLo=; b=yERv4Q+AdQLfkkKZDOl0n/pMcjAf/85DRGj8RUh26/MleWkLPKHhLC1KW2pIDiPONS pKzFbdqHdwTU3zcSeDrta1sxmxrC5WOo6Y7SlLHR6iKnvAp2dJe2K47M/FvYKObsklm8 UOV/N3TP4EAoU9JzEohJl75213zQHnCnAYD1FYUO5maoyYOB7i8lr7pNZiy3qieZJN4o OmEZGVX75qDXWSRfz2sYVKtgXiJJpLiyySYri5C9tfkiv0DAu7TKKZlmmJHZppyWWWSq 2lRb1EFNffJLsI0R59dfKfwEiEI5bkYzL0K8BWMvjF3PAL0fFnyvCdxfJI8D0CY0NkmO nT4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GUFWh4mD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y6si2701808oih.217.2020.01.30.07.27.17; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=GUFWh4mD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727409AbgA3P1B (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:27:01 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:46100 "EHLO mail-qk1-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727186AbgA3P1A (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:27:00 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id g195so3219284qke.13 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:26:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RIl5isGRyg0OUfNiiDJ603XTuJh1TpO2ohuCwJnOvLo=; b=GUFWh4mD354dqt4IHjGmax55/AM3DO2xfmAdmCTJ6WonsRnqp4qoVqcSyfCdxQYZG+ zqPoCwVRPz/k74VW94Beyp6erK/PIKJ83Bus54biO35fqykOmlUmymv9ZPkgA2Meg/Hk VGfWpXI/sLSvQHxnf6UqJnxxAwrwGXF6tKL2OwHB1uMB0XIaQEAvxpJXoh0ub3z+SMTv bh+C3azuvHE2Aq6j1FgmwN5/q+sIvxZhoYeO3CUIsvA9L4RiSHh27XZ37QrYbduyineK IYy5jEHLI4W6aVl2oZ4Ep3/JSUz4PVoaEGHAup0giPdCDzIo0yryNAlHU0p+yrzjSCY6 i0fQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RIl5isGRyg0OUfNiiDJ603XTuJh1TpO2ohuCwJnOvLo=; b=rel6n5Z/tyWm7wy4ogHy9pHOCw2yRnou0dlJ9EeJs+XR3wBUyn9AF7c915ZIyjbzKz 69zxHLqUuUItVGQfSI0JYftgdT45q22WPV9m8NY18aIvVRgaDxWYmPO428JX3fGdiYSF MZmEibwZpX4bhCgT6CYwBTSOOLXN+Hnia7QzSI9FmXBjCcMT23k/h5I8OUNgRLHgNVoY M+0C1mVBRn2ptKTi5aFIBZ4O54yKJ9QPG7fZ95MJ5RLuZa/1lMzbk3py5UXsa7IOjOHK XG4/DdX75e/sCp9xoMiv1iGaauDVotVpeigCEj6pDAEy1Q1XSZSJB/UrnqtOSIWPNQ+B Fv/A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3VtY2O2UNdV7+N8qjC2tDcBleumrc+3km5fIDKf0H5/QEt0wQ BTbC9EHsHPr/3GYbTu17/359Grqg X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e910:: with SMTP id x16mr5711773qkf.90.1580398019226; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (dhcp-108-168-58-21.cable.user.start.ca. [108.168.58.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm3167302qtq.22.2020.01.30.07.26.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:26:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1580398006.26012.81.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Strange performance issue when using two devices at once From: Marlon Smith To: Jean-Pierre TOSONI , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:26:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1580323191.26012.48.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 14:55 +0000, Jean-Pierre TOSONI wrote: > Maybe you need to put some distance between the 3 devices. > We experienced this kind of problem on radios close to each other > (around 10cm). > It was due to radio signals inducing themselves in the PCB of another > nearby radio, causing the other radio to badly transmit and receive. > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless-ow > > ner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de > > Marlon Smith > > Envoyé : mercredi 29 janvier 2020 19:40 > > À : linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > > Objet : Strange performance issue when using two devices at once > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have two RT5370 devices connected to the same access point. Both > > devices are very slow, but the instant I disconnect one device, the > > other speeds up by a factor of 10. > > > > The really strange part is that one device will perform slowly even > > if > > the other device is basically idle! I've confirmed this with a > > packet > > sniffer. > > > > I've been trying to do some debugging, and I've found that when > > both > > devices are connected to the access point, they report a large > > number > > of duplicate frames. I added some debug output > > in ieee80211_rx_h_check_dup() to confirm that this only happens > > while > > both devices are connected. The packet sniffer also shows a large > > number of retries while this is occurring. > > > > Using backports 5.3-rc4 for this, but also tested on 4.14-rc2. > > > > I did post about this previously on this mailing list (RT5370 > > performance issues), but I thought I'd post again with this new > > information and more descriptive title. I'm a little bit stuck on > > this > > for a while now, so any ideas are much appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Marlon Thanks for the reply Jean-Pierre. I just discovered this morning that if I change the MAC address of one of the devices, they both perform well. So I'm wondering if it is a driver issue. However I will keep this in mind, as I often do have multiple devices together in close proximity.