Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5829465ybv; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:50:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJtCid1CtGtTDxlnaFue4TdfQm6LmSvvaqFrziJ0/tJfRrYvqNuw0zIqIMnURbyHIg+PoZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18f5:: with SMTP id d21mr8353608otf.225.1581497415394; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:50:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581497415; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h3JGov1KPFrXCo3aD1paWCM+l09Ok/dX4FF68UfT9bMnGZiEry4rmTMredi0HdMxrk 8ByWJRzuYsbSZqsC88TKfGM53iUSP4kz/qZSKFIN9O3dhQvOm2i5gxM5++JAs0M1yOdG x9kBP+xb1E8N/f7YjHQyKBZf06neomXAKQrMIINcts68V2feAMwNoUQzshhuJuwAWxCm p6hwRhms/P/j0gFpyCBkVqEt0UsWYS5yDhDxM2Z+XSLbMeMdpmWQbbHbHZCPgw3VIDXX AZc0R58ELHnzGdEU7pPrPuaUb+t1PMNDAKScd1cx9yvJbHzUhsl3AsaX3QRyZ06+JhG2 PgwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:authenticated-by; bh=MgWDbmBlfeJg7+TqXaeM55+OxyrSM53O8LYyAfjdgf8=; b=POdroOz464vdFwVX+Eg0ezADwkOJ/fhAdCxRNZlsSMnSrz7EfJUmndBgiLUfO0lMqC 0n5u4Zdp7T39RrX0ngMkjWJHGNCz46rKXtQ9sEt+5yJnuhB/wfpejy3P5btTz7d2QIJz uJHB//dreP5GxY0ap0VWXrpIYSNbqUS23RNwRIqNSwLTOL7VXR9lY+s2htJc9aBO20HA mzmip/pio4VEmG5aqkW/7pRg6qLUZemKGhLwPK3VbdLHlDFtMuf/wqyIK9+3J2scC7/8 6k2WCwtD+x3XinzVpDizLHYbafD91nCLUKAX1kncfYUXy4v+wGwBV5OIFOxKWHdGw/7o LLAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d22si3364583oti.316.2020.02.12.00.49.56; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728698AbgBLIsH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:48:07 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com ([211.75.126.72]:48527 "EHLO rtits2.realtek.com.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728562AbgBLIsH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:48:07 -0500 Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 5.62 with qID 01C8lvQx021175, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (RTEXMB06.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.99]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.57/5.78) with ESMTPS id 01C8lvQx021175 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:47:57 +0800 Received: from RTEXMB01.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.94) by RTEXMB06.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:47:57 +0800 Received: from RTEXMB04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXMB01.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:47:56 +0800 Received: from RTEXMB04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::d9c5:a079:495e:b999]) by RTEXMB04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::d9c5:a079:495e:b999%6]) with mapi id 15.01.1779.005; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:47:56 +0800 From: Tony Chuang To: Kalle Valo CC: Chris Chiu , linux-wireless , Brian Norris , Andy Huang Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] rtw88: add regulatory process strategy for different chipset Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 1/2] rtw88: add regulatory process strategy for different chipset Thread-Index: AQHViMFAaPadjXgXtE6wjez3nesvPqdqOC0AgDbp6YCAALavM4B2Fwfw Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:47:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4cd295d1d1b143d7879050c3bb14bf97@realtek.com> References: <20191022101229.26044-1-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20191022101229.26044-2-yhchuang@realtek.com> <0101016eb59d3246-c013abc9-4fbf-4825-9780-a85cff3f43d2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <0101016eb59d3246-c013abc9-4fbf-4825-9780-a85cff3f43d2-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.21.68.175] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Tony Chuang writes: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chris Chiu [mailto:chiu@endlessm.com] > >> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 11:54 AM > >> To: Tony Chuang > >> Cc: Kalle Valo; linux-wireless; Brian Norris > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rtw88: add regulatory process strategy for > >> different chipset > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:12 PM wrote: > >> > > >> > From: Tzu-En Huang > >> > > >> > There are two kinds of country/regulatory efuse settings > >> > for Realtek's chipset, one is worldwide and the other is > >> > a specific country. For both settings, REGULATORY_STRICT_REG > >> > will be set, telling stack that devices original regulatory is > >> > the superset of any further settings. > >> > > >> > For the chipset with the country setting being a specific > >> > country, Realtek does not apply any new regulatory setting > >> > notifiers to the card. > >> > > >> > For the chipset with a worldwide regulatory setting, > >> > Realtek's custom worldwide regulatory setting will be > >> > provided via wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory(). > >> > And if a new regulatory notification is set by > >> > NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_COUNTRY_IE, the new setting will be > >> > applied to the card. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang > >> > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang > >> Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu > >> > >> Looks good to me. > >> > >> Chris > > > > Gentle ping of this patch set :) > > This is on my queue. I just want to investigate this in detail and > haven't found enough free time to do that. > Is there anyone else wants to comment on it? Appreciate if there's any suggestions. Thanks! Yan-Hsuan