Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7C7A0C43383
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc:     =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Kazior <kazikcz@gmail.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: support PCIe enter L1 state
References: <1542163848-837-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org>
        <20181115002836.GA71934@google.com>
        <c94346b26a6d4b11a045a176ca854051@aptaiexm02f.ap.qualcomm.com>
        <20181115184333.GA87504@google.com> <87va4x8q2c.fsf@codeaurora.org>
        <CABvG-CVAnwkiKVJik0PdsmRxF62kKv2N+aRKNq=nbopoExLvDA@mail.gmail.com>
        <87y36q75wr.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
        <CA+ASDXO8NujrORVLZMPbDy916cnzOvx_Bp8Vr-VvkbBwJvB97A@mail.gmail.com>
        <87h8cd8zy2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
        <CA+ASDXM8gtn3=p5pQ=GOFdfTy-698ZPW91JEgAfapdLEcU+eMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:15:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+ASDXM8gtn3=p5pQ=GOFdfTy-698ZPW91JEgAfapdLEcU+eMg@mail.gmail.com>
        (Brian Norris's message of "Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:48:44 -0800")
Message-ID: <87r1yywxf1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:42 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
>> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:42 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> >> No replies from anyone (including Wen) for 3 months about testing this
>> >> patch on anything else than QCA6174. So I'll drop this now, please
>> >> resubmit once test coverage is better.
>> >
>> > I know this isn't exactly what you're asking for, but FWIW we've been
>> > using this since late November on all our QCA6174 products. No issues
>> > seen as far as I know, and we have seen some power savings.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback, this is very good to know. I also would like to
>> apply this but not before we have some testing feedback from AP chipsets
>> like QCA988X or QCA9984. Wen, are you planning to test those and
>> resubmit?
>
> May I ping here? We (Chromium OS) are continuing to carry this patch,
> and would love to come up with something that can land upstream. If
> necessary, I can rework it to apply more specifically -- e.g., only to
> QCA6174 PCI IDs.

Yeah, enabling only for QCA6174 sounds best.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches