Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:16:29 +0530
From:   Maharaja Kennadyrajan <mkenna@codeaurora.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Vikas Patel <vikpatel@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: avoid consecutive OTP download to reduce boot
 time
In-Reply-To: <87pnei7exs.fsf@codeaurora.org>
References: <1578378195-25780-1-git-send-email-mkenna@codeaurora.org>
 <f1b4007f9d7e882c4ed2db67dc64cc96@codeaurora.org>
 <87pnei7exs.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <0a3ff5df5e16e2657f76214d1448d0ad@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-02-13 19:43, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Maharaja Kennadyrajan <mkenna@codeaurora.org> writes:
> 
>> On 2020-01-07 11:53, Maharaja Kennadyrajan wrote:
>> 
>> [Maha]: Please ignore/drop this duplicate patch as I sent it already.
>> Regret for inconvenience caused.
> 
> Are you sure I should drop this? In the first patch I think you forgot
> to CC linux-wireless and that's why I didn't see it. But this second
> patch was CCed to linux-wireless and I see it on patchwork. So my plan
> is to put this back to my queue, please let me know if I have
> misunderstood.

[Maha]: Hi Kalle, I sent the same patch twice. So I asked to ignore one 
duplicate patch.
You can pick up this patch to put it in your queue and please ignore the 
duplicate patch.