Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp4302213ybf; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 01:07:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsz8xWjtto+iVHjbeh81FsotNJ7hKmzCZb7di1AjopwjhJZ0z3EHdMu7bjlhP0RO5X4zGjc X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70d5:: with SMTP id w21mr1582375otj.65.1583312878531; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 01:07:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583312878; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BK+BosinZwRD4jt5hKD+fH13wOZWsQKJOVHvMtXDWDBnezeLBWZNWHK23qpZXr8P5e Mww1qteuIH8WYoXcWoq7SK1u76JRJ0MDYLuTiz770NiovT4VmM8x0BUrz1MOGV/zsUdO nNS73TSwtKQm99hqMveFUmBej6ZZVkSum5Sb84ydXHyP4xGeDV7+9NCtL/06xTuPmNUE QVlR8QcWdaDQflmKkd9YhksJ1Wo1u9/oa02fEcdnWGaR4k6TZdXaNqp61B8VYqvqfOjo qi2irXyC20HanseW70AZmBNqL4OD9Z+iwRpJVoalbt8cOQB2k931hYm9IJ2bFXecRfbX OnTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id; bh=BmF3Ch1HGn8UdCFVTcCjbf1MCoVGSsolNgBl8CzBX8A=; b=g5oCvwl3UAk1tTdGnYx9wZiSaEXrA7fJElubasR54HlR+STDbfm2676i5VsiuPcFde W2GhAkySyOIjA4jHDWjBBEjAXuW3vJskGQu5Je4FNzYuxyMrWJqMTTYVsaG4otBiZMfr QUUsf9J9udUDLbTWpg/M3JZt9ukDPZT/8oEQMnV+5CcjFxKEKkVZ5oenvHVld4PenJm3 PkWBVye6ucqDAnoni5heccOztMC6LwqbQJXgQO8MlwuNMZXZRP3T0WNi3pogeixGHrH8 AM75857Ik4gKFdBrFOdV3tsCMLMjeXLWUUfxRfWVuu86a54RGAisMBBLvFE6Uhh/k66M PHoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y13si757508oto.33.2020.03.04.01.07.46; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 01:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728482AbgCDJGW (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 04:06:22 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:55143 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725271AbgCDJGW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 04:06:22 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2020 01:06:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,513,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="274593146" Received: from mtosmanx-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.249.254.162]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2020 01:06:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5.5] iwlwifi: mvm: Do not require PHY_SKU NVM section for 3168 devices From: Luciano Coelho To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , "dmoulding@me.com" , "kvalo@codeaurora.org" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , linuxwifi , "Berg, Johannes" Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:06:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20200128093107.9740-1-dmoulding@me.com> <20200211162450.2493-1-dmoulding@me.com> <87d0ajx3r2.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 07:39 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > Hi Kalle and Dan, > > On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:46 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > > Dan Moulding writes: > > > > > This is just a friendly reminder that this patch has been > > > submitted, > > > for what looks like a fairly major regression in iwlwifi that > > > impacts > > > (as far as I can tell) *all* 3168 devices. The regression is in the > > > v5.5.x series and was for a while back-ported to the stable trees, > > > but > > > luckily was noticed before the releases were made. > > > > > > There are at least a few bug reports for this regression: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206329 > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/706810 > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/7/811 > > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=252603 > > > > > > The Gentoo maintainers have already applied this patch to their > > > Linux > > > sources and marked their bug report "fixed". But it would be really > > > nice if we could get this regression fixed in the next stable > > > v5.5.x > > > release. > > > > I'll queue this directly to wireless-drivers. Intel folks, are you ok > > with this? > > > > The only person who really understand what goes on here is Luca, he is > also the one who touched this area I think. Luca is OOO and should be > back next week I believe. > The patch looks sane and it fixes issues for people, so go ahead and > merge it please. If Luca wants to make changes on top of this, he can > ask to do those changes on top of that patch. Thanks for the fix, discussions and merging while I was away! This indeed looks correct and I'll take this patch to our internal tree now to align it with the upstream code. I guess this should be sent to stable v5.5 as well. Dan, would you like to do that? -- Cheers, Luca.