Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp362014ybh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:32:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuM0WK5NUGVtvpjNVQ5GlJxEBZvbMbIsz8TgDfA9UnXh/J4MHtH9TlwZQJ03+P1G8tphTdx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:150f:: with SMTP id k15mr1467669otp.251.1583919153203; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:32:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583919153; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mI0sBatCxcJN9fqhZ6wX2W0EjR4db7gbY07vb5LgzXTMa747kJjHxSqFCLHbFiHJX1 BjzJ6DwmAvqCx6r9wjmoZUNVpwGZkxmobRShkq8w38pEQ/u2FEe/cyMuZcCWgSBrwHyY p74YXrEyUSqC2EYFdCHEYjCCJEaW7TqbyaCGCjLB2ObaxfvVGAsaceoCAISeKWIV7UKF MzDkbneF0IKXCiTUxE/8Q0mBBsa3Hw+BE15hX/PBOyny1xnLeSf++aRNGzUmVc9dP/Rm ygUGI02sXEkOIrwh/3V+6brl/o0ycgwl2W7DEAmqBMfKCFfN+K33tdb247MnERbDTgLF QS1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=wtK1oZwf4Ku4+mlEBnwts74+uIqp7kdvlKHG3meeEqY=; b=kKJUUUw4dChg+OyLryv8cjAS/vMZbXmW8/4IZKMQkDmeshT+mqIPhHlUYObNMZxvpl w3kuP8pipE4W5MU5jOghBb1s1XCjazdID81AJhDyIPxtWk03W5/ksCJKFnFMgtGxJTG9 CaDWVwxcpJaU2TixRa+dUWGXy9NZkrkbw6FvZ1xQyayI0eQ9kuk6NGAZXS+Ij3gqvWwL hFaFTXni3YF3GupkwJBWrVPsQweUdQqw6REQ+vXyG6IeJrWh4yzA+2aAn2EHIPHlBNWR LSb9L87HhAM0DZ8Rs2FrG/434y5FjPgaGb/TOGrSTR5uiAIOtwVz2uDgq1iU5K2ztsxN asKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h9si798242oti.155.2020.03.11.02.32.20; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728873AbgCKJbz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:31:55 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:45590 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728753AbgCKJbz (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:31:55 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jBxiR-000vTt-GU; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:31:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mac80211: support NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211_MAC_ADDRS" From: Johannes Berg To: Markus Theil , Denis Kenzior , Jouni Malinen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:31:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20200224101910.b87da63a3cd6.Ic94bc51a370c4aa7d19fbca9b96d90ab703257dc@changeid> <53190ece697ab7d9e83fdd667eaf9e05a4418193.camel@sipsolutions.net> <6e723a78-db68-8ffb-986a-4a3961107f72@gmail.com> <1a56c641eaa03c99dc9a90208902d8bb1ca1b0aa.camel@sipsolutions.net> <048b81db-8e92-7fe0-1f5c-3b6f9ea1a1f1@gmail.com> <366b1599374240ef194bf7eb6e1e47a8b675f474.camel@sipsolutions.net> <978dab89-343a-3fc9-dbdb-7acf87d735ca@gmail.com> <20200225110018.GA7561@w1.fi> <957c6850-b26b-4cfd-5bc9-d77400e621b3@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 17:24 +0100, Markus Theil wrote: > Is there any consensus on how to move on in this discussion? In my > opinion a pragmatic way would be to make rx forwarding of pre-auth > frames optional with a flag which can be set whenever > NL80211_ATTR_CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211 is included, like Denis has > already proposed. We could call this flag for example > NL80211_ATTR_CONTROL_PORT_NO_PREAUTH. Yeah, that seems right. Do you want to make the patch? johannes