Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200313030545.9184-1-mark.asselstine@windriver.com>
 <CAPuovEJWzAvCwWQq0E5MACxo=1Dk5pK4YyjH+d0W-bspAMJJQA@mail.gmail.com> <3d90288f0b8c41bfcd5f44781e82eb9f62a3e48d.camel@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <3d90288f0b8c41bfcd5f44781e82eb9f62a3e48d.camel@intel.com>
From:   Mark Asselstine <asselsm@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:41:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPuovELQ3UG1nUjd4boKrxM2zGChJVquV3X-0baO2L7sfXs6_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: set 'free_queue' to the loop variable, not a
 meaningless bool
To:     Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc:     johannes.berg@intel.com,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:15 PM Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 16:12 -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
> > Luca,
> >
> > This is my first time sending a fix for iwlwifi and I haven't seen any
> > feedback or seen the code merged. Should I have sent this somewhere
> > else?
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'm sorry, I have a huge backlog of work and I'm trying to catch up.  I
> will review your patch and apply it to our internal tree and then
> upstream it according to our usual process asap.
>
> Thanks for your patch!

Thanks Luca,

I appreciate the work maintainers do and how busy you can get, so I
completely understand. Normally I would have just waited, but again
this is not an area I have worked in so just wanted to double check I
didn't screw up. Thanks for the response.

Mark

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.
>