Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1689079ybb; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs+aP4qiccBcWYQ9wsoeU3HLGyIaEFvMdO2pf+7hBnDEQ9VnugOey/SnMq0qWp69H3vym6P X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9b07:: with SMTP id a7mr7044073ook.78.1585504595127; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585504595; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O7jzncbSmn4wb0DdvPI0Y9+dOv9sp0l7BQGqiOvd2P7KRkD3GZ/+e1pWXz7ncYTOoD 8nJ1KlXhLI0ARjd38C379CvzM/f3c+oyAmoDH/CZakrWRsmVLbUY6+4iKPYEhCq5q1Ki vqXjoTezfTHV/DKcqZOaJuiVjat0mbmE30z95CpKocDo75/joEdIUMELKl7lvbkE1hoS vbHM1QdTajz/zeFUR5vsFuZCxC2NZkBe/mugRkTF/LCRNNVNqVyw+QhOuPZAyO5Ap+9D 4y1+hl8fQvuLo/HlYcsYr2Z1ZUtiOL2Py9yyZBk29xBwjbFRpY/d8iuX2cCAMZrkYAL7 ysNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ZkkiKTx9eheKbN+3e01ZmNFuBi2xpSdOm9MWxRw64GI=; b=FkRlj3UzM/v68XeoWqtgXEvLzwhHPrqSikvDzTN33k9akwtELVvNUacFjUsjgME/xn 06tEYaDHpHkoiPb1Giqzj+PWi3I0owVYysO+JNGs0KhZMDl7QrzPUdnYF8TsJlh45uvw FE4Si3tjxcaja6SCAr8ElgEUgPG/oh+cILPWEmIVDRDOWyZjJ7fUNzEL+UQfYnjzsoKk uOecll3KpfomCHYWDzJWmruUiyvkY8KBEeBiprAu11dtse5xOogKLdLtsHnXB4hLqBWw Hi0TRvW0pTqPrX5cMKwJUO3I1rngchEX41NYoYxldMeqbULZWnfDemAC4YvBaPWTWPPa QuwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k13si3872716otr.165.2020.03.29.10.56.09; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728393AbgC2R4G (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:56:06 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:54745 "EHLO mx.sdf.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728358AbgC2R4F (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 13:56:05 -0400 Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:lkml@sdf.lonestar.org [205.166.94.16]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 02THoYVV027072 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:50:34 GMT Received: (from lkml@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 02THoW6w010257; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:50:32 GMT Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:50:32 +0000 From: George Spelvin To: Takashi Iwai Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Marek Lindner , Simon Wunderlich , Antonio Quartulli , Sven Eckelmann , b.a.t.m.a.n@diktynna.open-mesh.org, Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lkml@sdf.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 13/50] Avoid some useless msecs/jiffies conversions Message-ID: <20200329175032.GE4675@SDF.ORG> References: <202003281643.02SGhBrh000992@sdf.org> <20200329121129.GC11951@SDF.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 07:13:33PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:11:29 +0200, George Spelvin wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 09:52:23AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> I thought the compiler already optimizes to the constant calculation >>> for the above case? >> >> It optimizes that if the entire argument, including "seconds", is >> a compile-time constant. >> >> However, given "msecs_to_jiffies(hdev->rpa_timeout * 1000);", >> the computatin is non-trivial. > > Fair enough. But it's still a question whether an open code X * HZ is > good at all... I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "good at all" here. The value computed is exactly the same. msecs_to_jiffies(x) is basically (x * HZ + 999) / 1000, so msecs_to_jiffies(s * 1000) = (s * 1000 * HZ + 999) / 1000 = s * HZ + 999/1000 = s * HZ.