Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp201061ybb; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 00:43:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJAuUFcK/YWrL1IOh0I0SvMD8v6EwjomMQj2PpCNGtkOMULXxtuyWJRpMY6NMUe1Z0G7MKK X-Received: by 2002:aca:3986:: with SMTP id g128mr1982898oia.3.1585899809599; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:43:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585899809; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S3nHYcyGOqPPRRG/ayoAatwg3iDlAtDyURmeGtZ/IQ0NzRiI78MNRwdBnCPdAQ+/u9 KmqYLX8sGvFpTa93/8UJLE6LHNx56PcwvS1+UC8n6a5tao4Eg7Pb2wBOPKCfkpWZmQ3T WkNHA+oCzA1uHsZMN3W51kIfXYGOZHFoxjcwLpMqZnSD76UbgES5KUbzaUPXCtlGZgkn snzQ9ZwOZBUGSk/vIZoNgzZbbl3Awk3OD6WOO9RnHA4CMmK2NWoK1QbNBCKjggmvfLyS XpwO5zZA+R8ECR6Q+np3f2wLsGkHBwGByx7klZPQ2YnAHg4GLeTZx+xV80TuKEQS+SXV jNpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=qFaIqoxwUe9ysWNEdvZGpWkJArIzzp/tfUXLdH5gS64=; b=LAeHQqnRHu16jRSLkXu/JFK/QDKUTpkwIr3r2QBVnlaSRoigu6mJvdZUyWZSHp8eKJ hiP/WJKQT/Z0IyhqShFZ971LXdP8P7x7LYKPvaOd7nhBaiUXnAuF/uFYxVvBF0BzFoC6 9zbwKqmkYyB6TPQBSJ4RVChVW9shJiJjI3slKIHO34ZDYF1/bGurLfjQA1bJ/MH9zxJg Sb5mhRqSZCbqjSvKSRiCpII5Z2tGV2HE3GxyLHvPYKQXerPMo4sgYpfp+Tx6Xqr4zHae Hr4H3H1MeMjdyCZDgm+zf2pTepozjZK43ugxREFXeLj5og1cUv3q0wOsRMhJcyu5FGEt JsiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KcG564o4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v14si3843045oth.49.2020.04.03.00.43.04; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KcG564o4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390296AbgDCHmz (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:42:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:42177 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730759AbgDCHmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:42:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 139so7042539qkd.9 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qFaIqoxwUe9ysWNEdvZGpWkJArIzzp/tfUXLdH5gS64=; b=KcG564o4naeszHPQaCUG43TLopoLHQcXNhy55ihf4J655P1X1EX2er+7j98/34GC3H yxGA4jHLR9t/ysr+9MFg7AFVOVSODpPoUZMysTDJDoTljG+COLNwQDyC9opauJPkGeRH oaNjwl6yhnT2u4S/B54XjZRB1v1D8sXS1W3BL/GB7oO0yEYpR5571pe/h5pD02wsWkNw 3ekuRKXOXG20oha+a9fMG9Bp5qCI3rpJCdJyVjk1hOjKV7hcYSB0P1WSFtQjB7ctuAYN JEkuSjE8Pf3dOu5lyeM743GMe2WJ0ZZAODO0uyL1sKm7zZ2ce8PIS2LpnzKPNoaDw2rK AOPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qFaIqoxwUe9ysWNEdvZGpWkJArIzzp/tfUXLdH5gS64=; b=OGl2y+fLS8/bpEWo26Eas8AUDN+kQfBHYdP90EFeYYHKaTO200OmbU91nl1ryD3K8Z F7lRr+nBgcxcXsBCJ9t69tcchctf+NM3oSPzYRs/BEGXD1O/6/e5QImp1Lj6wSmVJn3d TVf8Px09bAwdCYk7CwcWY2ApiW3c+HhxSo1daSMJk91xIXmvvebY6b7LXbOw4MtGYNGR uIOEzDUWAkkHL79gZ7ynfmQX7PStFMuw6HjOHzto2Qrtdv1vlcMijWz+778btW55pAUQ EKZVFka4fj7N15ihhxC7bLiJsUpPzz7DMGvXewjswIikanLB8Xk61DbEEW9+Lg0R2YLd rfUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubxFo+qu2Y+afjoBaLL2jwZ/dsD4Q9vryyaIpV06FlFnd8i5IzI jzGAAFescNfkLX+YkZVO2hBJ/K/3QdLmAcranxc= X-Received: by 2002:a37:634d:: with SMTP id x74mr7584637qkb.254.1585899772041; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:42:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3abf2b162f18e41345e230301d57348ba348c09f.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Equipe Soft Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is iwlwifi-9260-th-b0-jf-b0-46.ucode a debug firmware? To: Luciano Coelho Cc: linuxwifi@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi there, did you had time to look at this issue? Thanks again. > > @team > > Le mar. 24 mars 2020 =C3=A0 11:50, Equipe Soft a =C3=A9crit : >> >> Thanks a lot Luciano for your answer. >> However something remains a bit strange to me. So let me please ask you = the following questions: >> >> Q5) is it normal that Intel AC9260 firmware size is quite different betw= een "older" and "newer" versions ? For example: API46, which includes debu= g information, is ~1.4MB whereas API38, without debug info, is ~2.5MB (so b= igger !?) >> >> Looking at https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi/cor= e_release#core_release, I get: "Core43 Last version for 9260 and 9000" >> Looking at https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi/cor= e_release#devices_not_maintained_in_mainline, I get : " 9260 (Core43)" >> But looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/l= inux-firmware.git/commit/iwlwifi-9260-th-b0-jf-b0-46.ucode?id=3D4bebf45872a= 9818a17e2079118500030a8fa377a, I see: " iwlwifi: update FWs to core47-142 r= elease" >> >> Q6) so previous wiki page says that we shall use driver Core43 release b= ut we can notice that Intel AC9260 firmware is still updated for Core47 . S= o which driver version should be used ? >> >> Thanks again for your answer. >> Best regards. >> @team >> >> >> Le lun. 23 mars 2020 =C3=A0 10:30, Luciano Coelho a =C3=A9crit : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:13 +0100, Equipe Soft wrote: >>> > Hello, we really wonder if the version of the firmware we use is the = right one. >>> > I put Luca Coelho in copy according to his activity on git about >>> > firmware: thank you for your help Luca. >>> > Best regards. >>> > @team. >>> > >>> > >>> > Le ven. 13 mars 2020 =C3=A0 11:05, Equipe Soft >>> > a =C3=A9crit : >>> > > Hello, do you have any news about the issue? >>> > > Best regards. >>> > > @team >>> > > Le ven. 6 mars 2020 =C3=A0 10:33, Equipe Soft a =C3=A9crit : >>> > > > Hello, >>> > > > we are using backport-iwlwifi core45 drivers and latest AC9260 >>> > > > firmware binary blob: >>> > > > latest firmware available in Intel iwlwifi firmware fork: >>> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/linux-fir= mware.git/commit/iwlwifi-9260-th-b0-jf-b0-46.ucode?id=3D4bebf45872a9818a17e= 2079118500030a8fa377a >>> > > > 2019-11-28 iwlwifi: update FWs to core47-142 release >>> > > > >>> > > > At runtime, we noticed these log traces: >>> > > > iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Found debug destination: EXTERNAL_DRAM >>> > > > iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Found debug configuration: 0 >>> > > > iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Allocated 0x00400000 bytes for firmware mon= itor. >>> > > > So it seems that it is a debug firmware... >>> > > > >>> > > > Q0) can you please confirm that we can safely use this debug firm= ware >>> > > > in our product ? >>> >>> You can use this firmware. It's a production firmware and not a >>> debugging version. >>> >>> >>> > > > Q1) is debug mode deliberately enabled in newer firmware or is it= an >>> > > > error (maybe like forgotten to disable it) ? >>> >>> It is deliberately enabled. We enable some debugging options by >>> default so they can be extracted if needed. >>> >>> >>> > > > Q2) is there an impact on performance with this debug firmware ? = WiFi >>> > > > speed/throughput may be reduced or not ? >>> >>> No, there isn't any impact on performance. >>> >>> >>> > > > Q3) moreover, can you please confirm whether or not WoWLAN (aka >>> > > > Wake-on-WLAN) is working with this debug firmware ? >>> >>> WoWLAN should work fine with this firmware. >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > Q4) is WoWLAN working with any AC9260 firmware version ? and any >>> > > > iwlwifi driver version ? >>> >>> It has been supported for many years now. AC9260 got support for this >>> from the first version of the driver/FW that were publicly released. >>> >>> HTH. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Luca. >>>