Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: restarting efforts on AQL on intel wifi, at least?
To:     Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
References: <CAA93jw6cX48oAE=KrYOMUx_jY0zBpPc+Vg-b+7aYa7+7KRsOPA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Message-ID: <14f57458-a1d4-632d-7380-3c08e520f061@candelatech.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:08:14 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6cX48oAE=KrYOMUx_jY0zBpPc+Vg-b+7aYa7+7KRsOPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/03/2020 09:56 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> the AQL patches for the ath10k finally landed in openwrt head, and were lovely:
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/
>
> When I last looked the attempt to get at least some intel wifi chips
> working with AQL had stalled out with
> a variety of other problems. I've been sitting on a bunch of ax200
> chips, and am feeling inspired to tackle those.

Hello Dave,

What features does a driver need to support AQL?  The 'patch' to enable
it in ath10k-ct was just to enable a feature flag, so the underlying
features must have gone in earlier?

Thanks,
Ben

>
> Any news on other chips like the ath11k?
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com