Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp3247527ybb; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 05:17:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ3jTrQ82gTIuHpduaxz57CKlpUpILMSzUX2LaYIJcMnopNPjkvW8fiWwabWdfV9aGbQuN5 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:4e:: with SMTP id v14mr12789222oic.70.1586175447353; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 05:17:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586175447; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cw7okFbR6hNMWITX32p5lZVKXvW1sVsE4cf1GTL8agJKcQ3NW5f7aUH++Q/jE3lqIb N1l5sQtS2hah8KgPOSAiutg2yb7O1ezcq0OF3S+K6exqrz8gbCmGO6VX/4rWUyNA3vVK SuJnJM6brZmuekhifyTpqfLo1OBcV07/xJjIDGeH4NE/pYX5g9tMNzqlrSx3oCC1CCf2 zDInsQHWnttDjF9GloL/3A2oSSI5xqBfMWC/dOn0+ie0iDCOk1VAObeMnpHCWXGEZbZw 1j8ySVQ48EmKUBp1RZXNoz1amPd03eKvgyTk7kVA5yp33qqPQOTX/ZfWUY/oy5l46qgo pObg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature; bh=hPaukekXx0S9g5DYk6RxxkIC0V+FVGiqXWwaVk4VaVM=; b=jLn1BNybOujb2zshbhEb9LdjQEZINTSsFQWujXa5o3XrN/Dj+ROS7Nq76MxKtFI+xa 7GPOqJF9Jf73UJhfPdMmK4dyRP7WWt1xMETnZ0T1sht5hFKbWo46oveNbwDOoaDWDIw8 6YEKk/Tq2Yn57wBl1txoNM9VKFztmAlemNsCIoqB6d9GAq1hPbStTj8/bL0assAhUM4q vPGWcK3MGf2LYkq7F3vw25zrpZWkzy5KyLTx5ePwO9bCcnaUn4uU4uU13yAl78XauHWU Y9F3r+iHhpTMBiL2XmrwPxmmkhNw6BZ77dxqDzYKDgaznU0iATV0Ly/UtWvNeRB9sy/g LaqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=JKNc4Hfc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m22si8158617otn.81.2020.04.06.05.17.09; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 05:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=JKNc4Hfc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727832AbgDFMRI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:17:08 -0400 Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]:36171 "EHLO mail27.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727614AbgDFMRI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:17:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1586175428; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=hPaukekXx0S9g5DYk6RxxkIC0V+FVGiqXWwaVk4VaVM=; b=JKNc4HfcCRCBuYa9IVmPy43GWBtexiWexf45vP7EoI1UdRcvxp3yoYb237qvuHzd6omPhoiw +hy+mtBouXyEqK0bLXFXs9yC+PV92OksT9JcLZ1/L6HQqUyzFd/ITrfCbaXRtgfh/dsYVkiZ jK0nCCvEj/NBVO0nBMVACRSNkHA= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.27 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e8b1dc3.7fba18c74730-smtp-out-n02; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:17:07 -0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6C015C433BA; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10998C433D2; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:17:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 10998C433D2 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: yhchuang@realtek.com, "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw88)), netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit References: <20200406093623.3980-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:17:02 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20200406093623.3980-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> (Kai-Heng Feng's message of "Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:36:22 +0800") Message-ID: <87v9mczu4h.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Kai-Heng Feng writes: > On some systems we can constanly see rtw88 complains: > [39584.721375] rtw_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to send h2c command > > Increase interval of each check to wait the status bit really changes. > > While at it, add some helpers so we can use standarized > readx_poll_timeout() macro. One logical change per patch, please. > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h > @@ -253,6 +253,10 @@ rtw_write8_mask(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 addr, u32 mask, u8 data) > rtw_write8(rtwdev, addr, set); > } > > +#define rr8(addr) rtw_read8(rtwdev, addr) > +#define rr16(addr) rtw_read16(rtwdev, addr) > +#define rr32(addr) rtw_read32(rtwdev, addr) For me these macros reduce code readability, not improve anything. They hide the use of rtwdev variable, which is evil, and a name like rr8() is just way too vague. Please keep the original function names as is. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches