Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1476209ybz; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:44:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJTWvTjF8bu9VjiXlXYMiRrqw1dHBel0buZ1vn9txuEpE7Nn+hZ8Mi9zNA2BJjIK2W0sYfU X-Received: by 2002:a50:e68e:: with SMTP id z14mr1467293edm.307.1587620658021; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:44:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587620658; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HxNySJ4rqGv/s02ioYy0ubOUq8sHxhCV8hi/0fUdp84RHwZSws0c3YeODRRLHjVkdx 1QGiyOkhqKATqJoZSjxJkr/ijdongLXWX0OsH1MgiV8Ak/wi15Roo0bHvG7JARRjyRPC r67HZADCsjJV3X8NdWpu+PEgNQ1t+5gLII+0M7eg0+5q+bgyMZycymLhYF8R8Hk7xOLV ud7z7adXNn+Ukg29TfHGC5c3n3pqbrrXnfq0EC4dMHnyEXJcc6aIqVSg3j07u2mfp3Et f0hHMXGGIQfFHcRtWRvKrzy4ZH9W+CNX2s3CNPGb79jIGB4B6yXGAFHyGVSw7mIzDz5O FiqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version; bh=1HuhJGPPHyzGx98bhcuAmNl7WeJYmfV0P1VYt1eXrDo=; b=fDff1xP63RzyjGCaEAYvSHISKXCwfkQcLKU+IpjBrpFAu1OSrExBRJRTZgU3zWD34x au+oIeN2Bp3TjYqCCvxyNKIxOwygqzH3yrsu49EhmODJTTGh5wM7/igi8ffIxddAmlWE EEk5Vb5Ao7zphe7Tn02CJglgpp+u7vIfWmM2pXcOSslJ3h049BBKJfEbjj3t/398JOBP MCiRMoRkHbLdSqrgCJiwVKPZf3n/PhjRq+B1/GZNh4c7uGiCzeOaanCmur7RybmoRqNh C6ha7fodaIwqxaEwbHQtGIjt3DPzUMxYRgnBxdLg+LMV655hDT4qbI0/zS2HosuICJez T7wQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cf5si724164ejb.171.2020.04.22.22.43.41; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726721AbgDWFnQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 01:43:16 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:53372 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725854AbgDWFnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 01:43:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f197.google.com ([209.85.215.197]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRUdj-0004pD-Hz for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 05:43:11 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f197.google.com with SMTP id j16so3822354pgg.3 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:43:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ESaxmGd7fPiu+688kSbCEw4tfbbskuMrw/7qsz+XCCU=; b=tWA2YBWdNu3vDMJ5j9WHIGzXuYNoVwnRjofOnn/hBDxE6HGD0GWOL3pPpfZKYGnazf AMiCBBnKaplF/Y9O5fWvZGCIeuqTWU+HIiWOC0jybf3wjGb1Wk73JAzXrBBWaSdufGZL WFjqaDm7ZXlRg1HhRY50GkfKz0ml8qLe0oLroPKVIGk+7LegbViKcTl23oCPG/wBdJkw x0q6NOD6LD1K2XdEse5LyXs4MjLygl8Gp5SnUaYd8mPUCA5zuUA8B6UqqdV/DdzY0wuY Ub8Jf+4b4owJK2dxkt6UOffWggEBzL00KzaUf/oY0j3ioMq3bE+VTlf0p9M+8y+0dcV5 PXZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua6IWbF27xxbbAVD/0wvt0s4Tv4to2WIuBsvfDStDwFNQMd9sqB vuy5o1bUhlgF5vRAxMTBkxIhWqhhKEWUJcihzU9P0mRBJmTGlw2k+brDht+vp7fw6s6hzVdm5p6 FItw1hZXvxos/xWCsEXEsvYdCKSTNu7fc0e9Sih9GnFF+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:f503:: with SMTP id w3mr2316500pgh.397.1587620589535; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:43:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a63:f503:: with SMTP id w3mr2316483pgh.397.1587620589057; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.208] (220-133-187-190.HINET-IP.hinet.net. [220.133.187.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n17sm1350849pff.81.2020.04.22.22.43.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: rtw88: BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u16:0/33416/0x00000002 From: Kai-Heng Feng In-Reply-To: <20200422225526.GA1605@t2b3> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 13:43:05 +0800 Cc: Tony Chuang , Brian Norris , linux-wireless Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <110E6169-2516-446D-A3F4-FCD70783FB9E@canonical.com> References: <20200421211552.GA36171@t2b3> <20200422192524.GA35535@t2b3> <20200422205731.GA409387@t2b3> <20200422225526.GA1605@t2b3> To: "Tobias S. Predel" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, > On Apr 23, 2020, at 06:55, Tobias S. Predel wrote: > > Hello, > > I guessed from the deleted lines that > udelay(__delay_us) was missing. Yea I fail to copy that line :( > > So I compiled successfully and will observe how it will work out. > But for the first start on the patched kernel it's working and I will report. Thanks. I'll send the patch. Kai-Heng > > Thanks for your patch! Patch against commit a5840f9618a90ecbe1617f7632482563c0ee307e > is attached. > > Kind regards, > Tobias > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > index 245da96dfddc..e44767ec0532 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > goto out; > } > > - ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, box_state, > + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw_read8, box_state, > !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, false, > rtwdev, REG_HMETFR); > > diff --git a/include/linux/iopoll.h b/include/linux/iopoll.h > index cb20c733b15a..e4462712b541 100644 > --- a/include/linux/iopoll.h > +++ b/include/linux/iopoll.h > @@ -57,6 +57,49 @@ > (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ > }) > > +/** > + * read_poll_timeout_atomic - Periodically poll an address until a condition is > + * met or a timeout occurs > + * @op: accessor function (takes @addr as its only argument) > + * @addr: Address to poll > + * @val: Variable to read the value into > + * @cond: Break condition (usually involving @val) > + * @delay_us: Time to udelay between reads in us (0 tight-loops). Should > + * be less than ~10us since udelay is used (see > + * Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst). > + * @timeout_us: Timeout in us, 0 means never timeout > + * @delay_before_read: if it is true, delay @delay_us before read. > + * > + * Returns 0 on success and -ETIMEDOUT upon a timeout. In either > + * case, the last read value at @args is stored in @val. > + * > + * When available, you'll probably want to use one of the specialized > + * macros defined below rather than this macro directly. > + */ > +#define read_poll_timeout_atomic(op, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \ > + delay_before_read, args...) \ > +({ \ > + u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \ > + unsigned long __delay_us = (delay_us); \ > + ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \ > + if (delay_before_read && __delay_us) \ > + udelay(__delay_us); \ > + for (;;) { \ > + (val) = op(args); \ > + if (cond) \ > + break; \ > + if (__timeout_us && \ > + ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \ > + (val) = op(args); \ > + break; \ > + } \ > + if (__delay_us) \ > + udelay(__delay_us); \ > + } \ > + (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ > +}) > + > + > /** > * readx_poll_timeout - Periodically poll an address until a condition is met or a timeout occurs > * @op: accessor function (takes @addr as its only argument) > @@ -96,25 +139,7 @@ > * macros defined below rather than this macro directly. > */ > #define readx_poll_timeout_atomic(op, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \ > -({ \ > - u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \ > - unsigned long __delay_us = (delay_us); \ > - ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \ > - for (;;) { \ > - (val) = op(addr); \ > - if (cond) \ > - break; \ > - if (__timeout_us && \ > - ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \ > - (val) = op(addr); \ > - break; \ > - } \ > - if (__delay_us) \ > - udelay(__delay_us); \ > - } \ > - (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ > -}) > - > + read_poll_timeout_atomic(op, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, addr) > > #define readb_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \ > readx_poll_timeout(readb, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:57:31PM +0200, Tobias S. Predel wrote: >> Hi Kai-Heng, >> >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:25:24PM +0200, Tobias S. Predel wrote: >>> Hi Kai-Heng, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:48:55AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>>> Hi Tobias, >>>> >>>>> On Apr 22, 2020, at 10:21, Tony Chuang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Brian Norris : >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure about the first half your problem, but for the >>>>>> scheduling-while-atomic: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:16 PM Tobias S. Predel >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> [28125.482259] BUG: scheduling while atomic: >>>>>> kworker/u16:0/33416/0x00000002 >>>>>> ... >>>>>>> [28125.482436] Preemption disabled at: >>>>>>> [28125.482443] [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 >>>>>> >>>>>> ^^ This line is a bit weird -- shouldn't this have a real PC? >>>>>> >>>>>>> [28125.482452] CPU: 5 PID: 33416 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Tainted: G >>>>>> W 5.7.0-rc2-next-20200421-1-next-git #1 >>>>>>> [28125.482456] Hardware name: HP HP ProBook 430 G5/8377, BIOS Q85 >>>>>> Ver. 01.09.01 10/15/2019 >>>>>>> [28125.482477] Workqueue: phy0 rtw_watch_dog_work [rtw88] >>>>>>> [28125.482481] Call Trace: >>>>>>> [28125.482495] dump_stack+0x66/0x90 >>>>>>> [28125.482505] __schedule_bug.cold+0x8e/0x9b >>>>>>> [28125.482512] __schedule+0x686/0x7b0 >>>>>>> [28125.482520] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40 >>>>>>> [28125.482525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 >>>>>>> [28125.482531] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xa5/0x120 >>>>>>> [28125.482540] ? hrtimer_init_sleeper+0xa0/0xa0 >>>>>>> [28125.482546] usleep_range+0x67/0x90 >>>>>>> [28125.482568] rtw_fw_send_h2c_command+0xe0/0x1a0 [rtw88] >>>>>>> [28125.482590] rtw_fw_set_pwr_mode+0x95/0xb0 [rtw88] >>>>>>> [28125.482610] rtw_enter_lps+0xa1/0x100 [rtw88] >>>>>>> [28125.482625] rtw_watch_dog_work+0x21c/0x230 [rtw88] >>>>>>> [28125.482635] process_one_work+0x1da/0x3d0 >>>>>>> [28125.482643] worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0 >>>>>>> [28125.482651] kthread+0x122/0x160 >>>>>>> [28125.482658] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0 >>>>>>> [28125.482663] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 >>>>>>> [28125.482670] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 >>>>>> >>>>>> This looks like it might be a regression here: >>>>>> >>>>>> commit 6343a6d4b2130be9323f347d60af8a7ba8f7242c >>>>>> Author: Kai-Heng Feng >>>>>> Date: Tue Apr 7 15:33:31 2020 +0800 >>>>>> >>>>>> rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit >>>>>> >>>>>> That poll macros is using usleep, which obviously can sleep. We need >>>>>> to be using a udelay-variant instead. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe we need an atomic version of read_poll_timeout() ? >>>>> I am not sure if this is required, but seems like it is useful for me. >>>>> Noticed much of them have its atomic version, but not for this new added one. >>>> >>>> Tony and Brian are right. >>>> >>>> Tobias, can you please test the following patch: >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c >>>> index 245da96dfddc..e44767ec0532 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c >>>> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, >>>> goto out; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, box_state, >>>> + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw_read8, box_state, >>>> !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, false, >>>> rtwdev, REG_HMETFR); >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/iopoll.h b/include/linux/iopoll.h >>>> index cb20c733b15a..bc89ac625f26 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/iopoll.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/iopoll.h >>>> @@ -57,6 +57,48 @@ >>>> (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ >>>> }) >>>> >>>> +/** >>>> + * read_poll_timeout_atomic - Periodically poll an address until a condition is >>>> + * met or a timeout occurs >>>> + * @op: accessor function (takes @addr as its only argument) >>>> + * @addr: Address to poll >>>> + * @val: Variable to read the value into >>>> + * @cond: Break condition (usually involving @val) >>>> + * @delay_us: Time to udelay between reads in us (0 tight-loops). Should >>>> + * be less than ~10us since udelay is used (see >>>> + * Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst). >>>> + * @timeout_us: Timeout in us, 0 means never timeout >>>> + * @delay_before_read: if it is true, delay @delay_us before read. >>>> + * >>>> + * Returns 0 on success and -ETIMEDOUT upon a timeout. In either >>>> + * case, the last read value at @args is stored in @val. >>>> + * >>>> + * When available, you'll probably want to use one of the specialized >>>> + * macros defined below rather than this macro directly. >>>> + */ >>>> +#define read_poll_timeout_atomic(op, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, \ >>>> + delay_before_read, args...) \ >>>> +({ \ >>>> + u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \ >>>> + unsigned long __delay_us = (delay_us); \ >>>> + ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \ >>>> + if (delay_before_read && __delay_us) \ >>>> + udelay(__delay_us); \ >>>> + for (;;) { \ >>>> + (val) = op(args); \ >>>> + if (cond) \ >>>> + break; \ >>>> + if (__timeout_us && \ >>>> + ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \ >>>> + (val) = op(args); \ >>>> + break; \ >>>> + } \ >>>> + if (__delay_us) \ >> >> Isn't there something missing here after __delay_us? >> I got compiler error, misses ;. >> >>>> + } \ >>>> + (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ >>>> +}) >>>> + >>>> /** >>>> * readx_poll_timeout - Periodically poll an address until a condition is met or a timeout occurs >>>> * @op: accessor function (takes @addr as its only argument) >>>> @@ -96,25 +138,7 @@ >>>> * macros defined below rather than this macro directly. >>>> */ >>>> #define readx_poll_timeout_atomic(op, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \ >>>> -({ \ >>>> - u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \ >>>> - unsigned long __delay_us = (delay_us); \ >>>> - ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \ >>>> - for (;;) { \ >>>> - (val) = op(addr); \ >>>> - if (cond) \ >>>> - break; \ >>>> - if (__timeout_us && \ >>>> - ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \ >>>> - (val) = op(addr); \ >>>> - break; \ >>>> - } \ >>>> - if (__delay_us) \ >>>> - udelay(__delay_us); \ >>>> - } \ >>>> - (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \ >>>> -}) >>>> - >>>> + read_poll_timeout_atomic(op, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, addr) >>>> >>>> #define readb_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \ >>>> readx_poll_timeout(readb, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt, bevor Sie diese E-Mail ausdrucken. > > -- > Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt, bevor Sie diese E-Mail ausdrucken. > <0001-rtw88-Make-read_poll_timeout-atomic.patch>