Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 10 May 2020 23:54:13 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Cc:     "kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
        "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "briannorris@chromium.org" <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        Kevin Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/40] rtw88: 8723d: Add shutdown callback to disable BT
 USB suspend
Message-ID: <20200510215413.zyeq74pwhw4zw4mt@linutronix.de>
References: <20200417074653.15591-1-yhchuang@realtek.com>
 <20200417074653.15591-29-yhchuang@realtek.com>
 <20200505141455.k2mk7tmuiujfv2sh@linutronix.de>
 <c7083dc760464c1a9017888457c1718d@realtek.com>
 <20200506200129.suid6lfkdwuoapzl@linutronix.de>
 <2ee629b3bb374532b0830a39b57c2389@realtek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2ee629b3bb374532b0830a39b57c2389@realtek.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-05-07 04:26:24 [+0000], Tony Chuang wrote:
> 
> Ping-Ke, can you please help to check on this ?
> Looks like Kai-Heng is doing the much same thing here.
> 
> But it's still worth to do it in wifi side I think, because it's difficult to
> make sure the synchronization of BT and Wifi patch.

Yes. It sounds reasonable to remove the patch in BT so the device is not
always avoiding the suspend mode.

I don't remember if I asked this: Shouldn't the USB reset get the device
out of suspend? I thought this is part of the USB test. Could this be
fixed in BT's firmware?

> Yen-Hsuan

Sebastian