Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp285119ybm; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfmbTxXn3bHl8irNu8I8WFqCEHyhqy8GKFmv//Bli+9J3h1CKvNvrceE1XFkXYNYi2xCEa X-Received: by 2002:a50:be8f:: with SMTP id b15mr2096835edk.182.1590658945150; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590658945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dYvkdU1HB2phf8uRgVHxOVZrYnDq0YqJKlYdj5uDpkQLc3xKhbvwWozSNR7iqJyDE1 ONqmub/Pc4H/e30Z5rD+68793xPWqG3xiYGiwJU3aQ4LfCE7d0CEODZtS2Fh15vu7vJx E1QB5kgg0ueU9xGgtfqSehV//wxjYfSv3EWNvx7lrYBNbjditmoywAmWCUc6OYgsB8LU mO1YrZYKvxkZI8FsAslyN4ao+82mnXEbp7rlje5blnqq/FzROt/pbuA/b69Y8hKY0FKc 6GcTD8mslyHgp20z4pRLwQMe6OZQbvX3s/RuuZM6S7V75AJDP3jeMjsd4MFcf5JjzkQG 5uVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=I5ujzJ2+JJAd2Pc/5vGjeQHQcTYHokkxlT//tHvtaL8=; b=VIqm59UJ+cd/KxehH1v34ROhLN3iZjD+RwgACNnaZ3JPTqVzjvWuPeSZlWjEUC0cj2 G72MEgUA+XhJjMYC1zvK2LzkPTyULNHW7fVPSlHNAYUOiNFA4sW66iSvgige4D6BA/n5 Decl/1XUiePgNDHwZaTjXqYyhS9jElP0X76PWLTDqAyPu9Ixt6YzZXGDakQfUWzekho3 +ROX8VAbYExGQes4sqX362Yg/u84msljLoDM2RCaeQonR1eAnzhE+/hwQonGeB6cj+H2 Kix4IqCwBZabNXf1BFNwSnT6XsZ7CUPB68nSiEQIi7E3/q/VT5ni+HQa/7mbE15ClYdK rO6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si2346910edl.529.2020.05.28.02.41.50; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728421AbgE1Jlo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 May 2020 05:41:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53732 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728300AbgE1Jlo (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 05:41:44 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495D3C05BD1E for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jeF2j-004m86-Mz; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:41:41 +0200 Message-ID: <650d683aeabd94a69bad64ae2a0af45c2fe25cd1.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mac80211: determine chantype from HE operation in 6 GHz From: Johannes Berg To: Rajkumar Manoharan , kvalo@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:41:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <74232fe9a140a15306c04f0509e6c615b8e329de.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20200527_164156_614875_57253EF5) References: <1589399105-25472-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@codeaurora.org> <1589399105-25472-10-git-send-email-rmanohar@codeaurora.org> <74232fe9a140a15306c04f0509e6c615b8e329de.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20200527_164156_614875_57253EF5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2 (3.36.2-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 16:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Hmm. Yes, we just had > > + case IEEE80211_HE_6GHZ_OPER_CTRL_CHANWIDTH_160MHZ: > + if (abs(he_6ghz_oper->ccfs1 - he_6ghz_oper->ccfs0) == 8) > + he_chandef.width = NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160; > + else > + he_chandef.width = NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80P80; > + break; > > > but that breaks if you don't support 80+80 or 160. > > OTOH, we check this later again, I think, and downgrade if we don't > support it, so no harm done? > > I think I'd prefer the parsing to be exact, and then downgrade as > necessary. That makes things a bit simpler. Except that won't work for mesh. I actually kinda like this better than what I did, because what I did required all kinds of contortions with DISABLE_HT/VHT/HE ... Still checking. johannes