Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp486242ybm; Thu, 28 May 2020 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2LCNIJvM1HigJlGlhFgZbMvrEljisTZvQAdW8MBRo4Dum549Nprhoe7H1KgbYLyDh8peL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:94d5:: with SMTP id d21mr3251532ejy.342.1590677443598; Thu, 28 May 2020 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590677443; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Pu9oTCzO9Hxb4me4VwUfDWm8aP9SBzJQcMIfd9aoV2zkChlL2Ybm/ZbBnqJrh7+kk0 qACFuegjk4wttv6sGro3zrZ1JS/jy8a/aaeYw86JOvWj7D7zkKG10RTJF8wi5lqE8lvV cElHKnSteCZQPm3ykLEIj5ErTFuCtXzZrHktdq5hKl+lMRnjNN1anw3Th434EE/iz20S j4psy9GAX0RJdxCkZqrXl16xHEJ4HWdsLNvO4NrqIhBrDZtN0QOre/f2e4Kzw3Ch7F1x /WYEVoiI84XxgTVx9w09DlCKW6wHnbllRE2xBsU/f1n+Cgzf+fRm8vM8bBtoWQpiiQpu hIKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:from :subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bSZjn/YvSK4b7fgeu9ORJ+n96ff8mO9AHHeQcRQO2AA=; b=uxULl0PCA51LXAjQmOGqf+BW3jjud4fW+TlX3QfDT05vr1ppZvkWXHBUfpu62F0v4f 0yXaNby3MfBY+Zt5vYMUOFK7rFtdxjKa3yQt8v67tFmwpsqUUS/bKs4bqBFOluRL530H AEOXkLMD0NixrNaUHvKmyvZwLCAhz9xHWKFSaXU9IJxBTvoa8dwRT4Zu0Sxd0795IvHn 5pZdr4r+319TzahbPArBLG5tktfApjFgMoBQbGehTwtj6F+YPsxnuKy8FpxLbiIQPy3H plg6BY6RVjhxCVTjxTJlLECEYvtU5sGmFA8HLBpnNLv/gl3U/43xVGcWaUUnhP63/7eJ Y1zQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gf8si3937338ejb.238.2020.05.28.07.50.18; Thu, 28 May 2020 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728598AbgE1Otr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:49:47 -0400 Received: from p-impout010aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net ([47.43.26.141]:47484 "EHLO p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728539AbgE1Otr (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:49:47 -0400 Received: from localhost ([97.96.18.55]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id eJqqjJE4EOQ8heJqrjWzmS; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:49:45 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=SrXuF8G0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=gnb2rATmHlbHhomeAxXZdQ==:117 a=gnb2rATmHlbHhomeAxXZdQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=o-53GSTNTxPpq0pbfBgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: iwlwifi: 8265: unexpected LLC packets TX'ed in monitor mode From: "Marco" To: "Johannes Berg" , Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 10:26:04 -0400 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAOq67BEj59AZO74DpW9m/MifcsIuyVHgMfbLrRjLBJC34PnTKOkITiACRxMGt4nko6fHHE9FCp3xXAyV1uJUPvjy/DycxTCFoFC3mh4ii2i9BOkfpQJ //XQYg4ONCvX+FG6SvQKUvs9GviBrYgUiW4tmVdemzOyV0sPVKQqC0OGGMiAD2Jo5n5nWTCSdy9yCdKD60L3Vd7TC3nM2v6iJDQ= Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon May 25, 2020 at 7:23 AM EDT, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 13:48 -0400, Marco Fonseca wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > While in monitor mode, the 8265 will periodically transmit gratuitous > > LLC packets. In this mode, I would expect the wifi chipset to not > > transmit any packets at all (unless packet injection is being used). > >=20 > > This behavior can be observed by a second wifi device in monitor mode. > > A display filter on wireshark/tshark of 'llc' makes these easy to spot. > >=20 > > It seems these packets only get produced in presence of a few APs > > and/or STAs but I'm not sure of the exact cause. I don't see the LLC > > packets on very quiet channels. > > I think these are somehow related to calibrations in the device. > > johannes Are you perhaps implying that I can alter calibration settings to fix this problem? If you have any pointers to this it would be appreciative. Regardless though, I would still expect the default behavior to not emit packets when in monitor mode, unless the user directs it to; similar to what I've seen from other wifi chipsets. Marco