Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp539315pxk; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGyM8CjIQqK+8wad8/KQ3n2pnw9m5BhYcGTZFwrvihlwzzrJz+ul501S0xFLTgmcgMFIpQ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de03:: with SMTP id h3mr4437980edv.232.1599856843479; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599856843; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RKVQ6rhDvdYZ1IJd5tN2NJ3jlKvwNPimjfeE+3SFFWwajGr9Tmj7NbV7cT5ds1VpTI qUSAn9s2SuJxyRzzx1yJbhX6Hk6fo6MVeNJENF6RmBQ9ftJuAODxmPo88xJU37r21G+5 k2zqvqDk7JUo9mPIGzO6SySZT58KC/wPdaGRQMQKqW8Ur3BRsSCvVFgblBnuEq34wytF 4Ai0qeK4M5PUCKd8F8hCYtNLcJ6ZbjyU8f89ogMTuRJg6SHpe0vE5yv48VEdtHaiDE26 1u0iS0muLpq+KNfhBwijRQouCNSD7pFk44Y92amcnmWNcJBJwm/mukRsHnHFqyMAs2Fc QPgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=KLCufJGPdjede/iOOg3qd95bFBZOP+7NKl500zfi+ZI=; b=d+ItG87CzhTl68ooDabJp8w1xqH55SmdCpljVKvl3WzwsWy9jUqPAT405+n5s+hzwS 4sPkivGgAckOSmGDqoDvswpP+SYnLjjoNQfbOTt0l4HT4ZPSBEtSTXdJWOhwiUvbZvsh 6qIJaN6sWazujR05CUYUwxfYWCRlthu42NZ77TM6JmdZ1TgGo3bP9IX7OuAi2lzdvNgv wfeziNp7G1zkxvfh9HhkxpTSo8rtWTjlB/ccJ5g5k3ZBmOR9lxiuLfvNWuUNOhovuY55 dOBhM/Jq6IYDnEheOlqcSf4zc3lxVBuk1o0tyQ1TdirbYBbu4Pzxq+MUmXFJliLY8mtq yONA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6si2305579edq.278.2020.09.11.13.40.19; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725815AbgIKUkH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:40:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54606 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725803AbgIKUkE (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:40:04 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE5DC061573 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kGppw-002OGR-Jh; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:40:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5225561f9f5c104bc84ab6e7f183de0ab5e0ea6d.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: Add radiotap channel flag option for 6GHz band From: Johannes Berg To: Aloka Dixit Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:39:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <010101747ee4b985-86863ec8-33e2-4f78-9d9b-93110bfa29fc-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <010101747ee4b985-86863ec8-33e2-4f78-9d9b-93110bfa29fc-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 20:39 +0000, Aloka Dixit wrote: > Radiotap header needs a new channel flag for 6GHz packets. > This change uses value 0x200 for new enum balue for 6GHz which was > previously used for passsive scan flag but has since been removed. You can't just add to radiotap in a kernel patch ... But also, just today I replied elsewhere saying that we don't really need a flag at all? johannes